Comments on: What If Your Vote Was Thrown Out?

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:29:49 +0000

That should be “one-off decision.”

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:29:05 +0000

Mr. Paulson is forgetting one major issue: The majority in Bush vs. Gore explicitly ruled that it was a one of decision, and did not set precedent or become the "law of the land."

I agree with him on the issue of giving the campaigns veto power over the inclusion of rejected absentee ballots. Everything else jsut seems to be a rehash of the already debunked right wing claims.

By: justpbob

justpbob — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:16:27 +0000

raking, rather.

By: justpbob

justpbob — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:02:32 +0000

Well, the Wall Street Journal is at it again, badmouthing Minnesota and the Coleman/Franken recount.

At least this guest ob/ed was actually written by a Minnesotan.

Justpbob to WSJ: Say, isn't there some muck on Wall Street that needs racking?

By: justpbob

justpbob — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:54:38 +0000

More proof that Mark Richie is not a partisan tool of the Franken campaign (as if more proof was needed).

By: PinePoint

PinePoint — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:00:34 +0000

If a candidate bumped my ballet, I’d have to take his tango, and maybe even filch his foxtrot.

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:34:09 +0000

If Kiffmeyer had been in charge, we really might have seen a replay of Florida 2000.

By: justpbob

justpbob — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:25:38 +0000

Rep. Kiffmeyer needs to look up the meaning of the word “wrongly.”

Thankfully. the controversal Kiffmeyer was not serving as Secreatary of State during the recount. That would have likely made this mess even messier.

By: Bixby

Bixby — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:50:26 +0000

Okay, now that “wtf” makes no sense.

By: Bixby

Bixby — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:26:55 +0000

Wtf?!