FiveThirtyEight is predicting Franken will win by all of 27 votes. How’s that for math!
- MNSpeak
- »
- Senate Prediction
FiveThirtyEight is predicting Franken will win by all of 27 votes. How’s that for math!
Exclusive deals, featured events, and the latest from MNSpeak, delivered straight to your inbox.
Fuck weapons of war also noodleman I don't want to pay for that either. Can you say red hearing. Pull out of every base around the globe is my ho...
Well, gosh, swandog. Let's make churches responsible for the behavior of all their congregations. But then who would be financially responsible for...
Assurance Process The American resettlement organization must "assure" the Department of State that it is prepared to receive each matched refugee...
Here's a short summary of the refugee resettlement process in the US: http://www.refugees.org/article.aspx?id=1082&subm=40&ssm=47&a...
Just did a quick search, and it appears that for 2009, the refugee quota was set at 80,000 again. Usually, fewer refugees are actually admitted th...
"So your premise is that the churches have nothing to do with importing refugee populations into the state." No ,they are involved, but the refu...
http://www.mnchurches.org/programs/directservices/refugeservices.html Our Partnerships: Refugee Services became a program of the Minnesota Counc...
Noodleman - I do NOT think that Somalians commit more welfare fraud than other groups of people. People are people they will always maximize a giv...
"It is the churches that are the catalyst for bringing in refugee populations and showing them to the door of the welfare office." Uhm, no it's ...
@Rat: Well, you asked who I had in mind. At least I'm providing links to things that actually happen; not just uncited innuendo. I could've also po...
© 2002-2009 Entropy Publishing, LLC.
No part of this site may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Entropy Publishing, LLC. except that an individual may print for personal use and/or forward articles via e-mail to a reasonable number of recipients for personal, non-commercial purposes.
9 Reader Comments
12:34 am
Is this where we place our bets? I’ll say Franken, but with 20 votes.
12:35 am
(That is not based on any sort of mathematical formula or simulation, fyi.)
6:47 am
I really wasn’t able to follow Nate’s argument this time. Too much math, not enough name calling. He should just accuse both sides of cheating like the Star Tribune commenters.
6:51 am
I’d check line 54 of the rules.input_evaluators.inc script and make sure the first argument in the callback to the call_user_func_array() function is valid.
7:20 am
I wonder if the sports books in Vegas have an over/under line on this. If it was at Franken @ 27 votes I would take the under.
7:44 am
The first time I read it I was confused too; it’s not very well explained. But in a word, I think what he’s doing is using the correlation between Franken gaining votes and a lack of challenges to estimate what percentage of the challenges will fall for Franken. It’s interesting, and I suppose it’s about the best statistical analysis a person could do with the information we have, but it’s a stretch. The statistical error bars are such that this only gives Franken a 52-48 edge (this is mentioned later in the thread), and that’s assuming the methodology is right. and everything is appropriately random, which of course it isn’t.
8:43 am
My prediction is a small nuclear explosion at Powerline if Franken wins.
8:45 am
And that line 54 stuff is just the sort of evidence Powerline will use to prove that Franken cheated.
8:52 am
Both righty tighty and lefty loosey blogs feed on outrage, Tom.
They might be secretly rooting for Franken. It will give them six years of material.