It’s been more than a decade since “Amy,” as she’s known in court papers, was first sexually abused by her uncle. The abuse ended long ago and he’s in prison, but the pictures he made when she was 8 or 9 are among the most widely circulated child pornography images online.
Should Amy get paid for the images that she claims hurt her every time they are viewed?
In Minnesota last month, a federal judge ordered prosecutors to explain why they didn’t ask for restitution in a case involving images of Amy.
A number of victims across the country have come forward seeking restitution from people who were caught with videos and pictures of their abuse. Now, judges are trying to figure out whether someone who obtains a picture taken years ago is directly responsible for the harm suffered by the victim. If the answer is yes, judges have the added complication of figuring out what amount is justified.
3 Reader Comments
9:08 am
Here is the victim impact statement Amy presented to the court. Reading it is heartbreaking, but also is important for understanding what her uncle really did to her. http://hamptonroads.com/2009/10/document-victim-impact-statement-girl-misty-series
7:02 pm
The few minutes you spend on this website, you’ll get the opportunity to ownand use some of the most powerful and effective ways to identify the right candidates ,who would be directly and indirectly defining the future of your organization. From recruiting to reference checking to employee orientation to onboarding, every step has to be planned and executed to be successful. This e-book will give you the practical ways to approach each step in the recruitment process.GoldStar Interviewsnterview QuestionsConducting Interviews
9:25 am
KC, after reading that, I have even more trouble understanding how you can defend sex offenders so much. He manipulated her, took advantage of her trust in him. Look at what he has done to this woman–he ruined her life. There are countless other stories just like this one.