Comments on: Pawlenty: Full Flop on Cap and Trade?

By: Marc

Marc — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:03:12 +0000

“Pulling a Romney” … awesome!

It is possible that T-Paw took some time to study up on how an effective (as in “actually affecting the climate”) global cap-and-trade regime is a geopolitical pipe dream, and that there are better, cheaper strategies for managing climate change, but I doubt it (since I don’t hear him talking about geoengineering and doing R&D on things like cloud brightening). Probably just the usual dumb partisan politics.

By: Bixby

Bixby — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:00:25 +0000

Well, thank God we got that stadium.

By: noodleman

noodleman — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:56:03 +0000

@baker: I wish T-Paw would rethink the impact his own economic policies have had on the state and its cities.

By: baker

baker — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:19:46 +0000

Maybe the changes in the economy after 2007 made him re-think the economic impacts cap and trade may have?

By: Bixby

Bixby — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:53:48 +0000

I don’t know, conservatives seem to be great with the bitch-and-moan.

By: thhom the punny gay guy

thhom the punny gay guy — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 23:57:18 +0000

I prefer kneel-and-bob myself.

By: Liquid Rob

Liquid Rob — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:35:34 +0000

cap-and-trade is a terrible idea

By: Rat

Rat — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:08:27 +0000

You might have coined a new term.

By: Bixby

Bixby — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:34:44 +0000

1. I believe that a Republican governor who was liberalish on certain things but who then becomes all conservativey on those things in lieu of a run for the White House is referred to as “pulling a Romney”.

2. At least they are by me.