Baseball Economics

13 Reader Comments

Well, in spite of all that money spent, the boys in pinstripes haven’t won the Series in nearly a decade.

2000 • 1999 • 1998 • 1996
1978 • 1977 • 1962 • 1961
1958 • 1956 • 1953 • 1952
1951 • 1950 • 1949 • 1947
1943 • 1941 • 1939 • 1938
1937 • 1936 • 1932 • 1928
1927 • 1923

1991 • 1987 • 1924

Now I am no mathematician but I think I can do the math here.

Hey, if I wanted ancient relics, I’d call Indiana Jones. If you can’t win the big one with a cherry picked All-Star club, that throw another manager under the bus! ;-)

That’s right, George, fire Girardi. Do it now, today!

like i said to some yankee fans last night, since 2002, the yankees have spent a whole BILLION dollars more to win ONE more division title.

granted, they’ve won the world series recently, but still.

@ryanl: Pre-free agency, and certainly pre-TV, ball club payrolls were a bit more equitable between teams than now. ‘Course, a deep-pocketed owner (e.g. Colonel Rupert) in the ol’ days could still outspend a miser (e.g. Clark Griffith) and the results were still pretty much the same as today.

This is as relevant as the fact that a $10 pair of Rustlers from Wal-Mart is pretty much the same as $200 7 for All Mankind designer denim from Len Druskin.

Yankees fans expect a postseason. Twins fans hope for one. The high end always has diminishing returns, like a Weber’s Law of economics.

From Citypages 10 reasons to hate the Yankees:

“Who are you going to have your kid look up to? This juicer ["A-Rod"]? Or Joe Mauer, who’s powered by 2% milk. ”

Haha. Win.

Matt Bartel Oct 8 2009
10:40 am

2% FTW

Not last night.

holy hell a trackback…I forgot all about the fact that this was a blog.

Leave a Reply