Secrets of the City

Damn, no Norm Coleman. I kid!

This doesn’t bode well…

These women should be hating the game, not the playa.

I wonder how long it will take before that site gets sued.

The Times story points to an attempt to create a class-action lawsuit to do just that.

I wonder how long it will take before being listed on the site is a cool thing. From the playa perspective, no publicity is bad publicity, I’m thinking.

That’s creepy.
Just today I was thinking about what a similar gay-themed one would be like, but decided it would be far too spiteful of a venture.

It’s not neaerly as creepy as the local sex offenders search tool.

By that, I mean the results of the search are creepy, not the tool itself.

‘the heck?

Isaac Hayes? say it ain’t so, Chef!!

I wonder if the hard-hitting friends with benefits story that Blimp 9 just broke (literally) – with no first hand interviews and no statistics – will prompt any local cheater posts?

I’m trying to figure out what’s slimier – being a total chump, or publishing the total chump’s full name and photo online along with one’s sob story. I think in the end, it’s a wash.

Weird, I know one of the guys on it. And he definitely deserves his spot. How about the girl version? Equality, people.

It’s about time chicks out these slimebags!! yay, girl power. Or something. I could start my own list of all of the a-hole guys in the Minneapolis area (there are a lot).

I’m not so keen on the whole “dis” aspect of the site. There should be an area where the dumpee can have a fair say if he feels up to it. I, too, was surprised no dudes from the Twin Cities. Oh well, where’s the site for cheatin’, hurtin’ women ie: shesjustabitch.com? That’ll be next.

I keep saying that on dating sites like Match.com and Nerve.com there should be a ratings area, similar to eBay’s feedback forum. So if you dated someone, you could rate your experience and let other potential daters know if the experience was positive, neutral, or negative. I know…maybe it’s silly, but wouldn’t people benefit from reading comments like: “Prompt, friendly, and would do this person again.” If someone got a negative comment, they could go back in, just like on eBay, and dispute it. Seems fair and you could really build up your rating and earn a certain colored star or Power Dater ranking.

Are you serious?? Internet dating is creepy anyway, but not as creepy as a rating system. There are dudes from the Twin Cities on there. I looked at some funny ones from Blaine, Apple Valley and there are others.

this is the funniest one i’ve seen (not that i looked at the site for all that long or anything…) although it seems fake. i don’t remember a Big Foot bar in Boston…

it’s a funny site for sure, but i think there should be a Don’t Date The Bitch, Bro! site to compliment it. youbetcha.

Angela, surely you must realize that a ratings system was just a joke! Duh. Purely hypothetical, but hey, creepier things relating to Internet dating exist, I’m guessing. I didn’t go as far as typing Blaine or Apple Valley into the search for guys. I’m sure creeps from all over MN might be in there. Watch out.

Come to think of it, there is a more positive website called greatboyfriends.com where men have their profiles/pics and women who dated them, are related them, or work with them explain why this particular guy would make a great catch to a woman who is trolling the Internet for a date or mate. So in a sense, it’s a ratings system. It’s not that creepy, not unless some guy’s sister goes on and on why the particular guy is so hot and desirable.

yeah i’m pretty dumb. I didn’t type in apple valley or blaine..they popped up! well maybe it was a bad joke? hehe..

Good gravy, greatboyfriends.com! Now that’s a good idea.

Although he keeps telling me that we’ve got no future together, I’m going sign up Mark for a great boyfriend.

In Fox’s defense (I never thought I’d be typing those words), they did try to get interviews. It’s just that no one would touch that story.

It looks like DDHG is supposed to have a link for guys to respond, but it seems broken.

If they made a site about bad girls to date every most entries would read something like this:

“She was psycho” (translation: she asked me what was going on and when I made up crap she kept pestering me for the truth)

“I broke up with her and she wouldn’t leave me alone” (translation: Well, I never actually said “let’s not date anymore” but I avoided her except when I made a booty call. For some reason, she still thought I liked her.)

And that she was boring in bed.

in manspeak “she was boring in bed” actually means:

“i’m pissed because she wouldn’t get it on with her hot girlfriend and let me watch”

You can put up with a lot of pyscho for that kind of entertainment value.

No Ted Canova entry yet?

This is my new favorite thread…

Dear dontdatehimgirl.com, I never believed these stories were true until it happened to me…

I’m late to this thread, but I noticed when I went to the site that men do have the option to counter any claim against them and give their side of the story. Their story will be posted right next to that of the scorned woman. I’ve noticed none of the men I veiwed there had posted a counter claim.

Do you know Steve Kraus?
Please visit my site and help me collect!
http://www.steveowesmemoney.com

Excerpts and Interceptions
——-

We’re gonna sue your butts off for Defamation, Slander, Libel, Misrepresentation, Negligence and Extortion – and have a little fun with ya while doing it too. But first
were going to let you build a little. Enjoy! Tasha Joseph, Joe Tracy, Marlon Hill

http://www.classaction-dontdatehimgirl.com

http://dontdatehimgirl.com/

http://www.manhaters.com

http://www.womansavers.com

http://www.truedater.com

————————–

man bashing for fun:

& the disclaimer women take full responsibility of everything that they post… until the then&

that love law:

‘as with its own lack of interest and ability to secure information validity has enjoyed virtual legal undetectibility’

…further noted in the brief, quoting the AP and UPI article ‘…have built a monster poised to turn on itself and creators to feed’

joseph wart

‘establishment and promotion of public forum for mass distribution of personal defamation and slander

&brief sites 3 of 7& all successful wins for the victims – Marlon Hill
& case law proved material culpability and association guilt, defamation, slander, libel, misrepresentation, negligence and extortion’

women haters exposed:

& study showed 8 in 10 women knew& or took random shots to cover their bases at the cost of innocent unsuspecting to exact revenge – says Tracy Joe&

‘the sites mission on guys, “truth kills interest”… once publicity began stirring, evolved into dangerous grounds when its founder changed gears, writing off the websites once noble philosophy “truth kills interest”… also discouraged publicity and site visitors& as entertainment

tasha: claimed no association’& got interesting if not ugly& undetectable unrelated website under investigation& found changing, deleting names, profiles, and information in the extortion case& to clean up ones name

When I was in the Navy we had a ‘rating system.’ Guy I went to Yeoman school with couldn’t figure out why the well ran dry and he couldn’t get a date! I told him his name was on the bulletin board. It was. First, he was married, left the wife back home. He didn’t mention that to the girls he dated. Secondly, someone had written he had a small appendage. I didn’t share that with him and don’t have first hand knowledge. LOL For the most part the girls were quite above board and honest in their ratings. Of course, if you dated someone incredible you kept it to yourself.

what about a little thing called “PROOF?”

can anyone post a cheater on there w/o a review or consensus? if so, then whose to say that someone who didn’t get what she wanted can post an innocent guy on there? I’m not saying there aren’t guys on that site who deserve to be labelled a cheater, but where do we draw the line?

There are a million different ideas that one can make into a website, but after further discussion and thought, they just don’t hold up based on too many holes in the framework. This dontdatehimgirl.com website seems to have many holes and even more so, may end up back firing on the girls.

If one were to read each of the articles those girls wrote next to the guys picture, they may come to learn how naive the girl may be, or that she is spiteful, or hard to live with, or gullible, or even worse that any guy would be taking a high risk by just dating a girl like this… being added to a website such as that one may be the least of that unsuspecting guy’s problems.

” hate the game not the player”……if it wasnt for players-the game wouldnt exist now would it???

lame excuse

What a lively debate about my website! The site is 100% legal. It functions much like a chatroom or bulletin board where women post their firsthand experiences with the men they have dated. In order for a woman to post a guy to our site, she’s got to agree to our Terms of Use policy and in it, it states that the woman posting attests to the fact that was she is saying is the truth. Truth is the absolute defense to libel or slander. Essentially, we put the onus on the women users of the site to be truthful in their postings.

Additionally, just like the eBay dispute system, men posted on DontDateHimGirl.com are given the opportunity to post a rebuttal or dispute to what has been said about them in a posting. How much fairer can one be? Both parties are given the opportunity to present their case.

As of this posting, there has been no legal action taken against the site. Although hundreds of men call each day threatening lawsuits, none have been filed and the site has been in existence for over five months! Men are just upset that women have figured a legal way to warn other women about their philandering ways! Hence, all the backlash and controversy the site has sparked.

And if there is legal action taken, we are prepared to defend ourselves.

Thanks for talking about the site!

TJ

And if there is legal action taken, we are prepared to defend ourselves.

Looks like that time has come…

Who were all those people who were just congratulated each other and then thanked themselves?

Ms.Joseph ther can be no lively debate amongst people where the woman is allowed to speak and post without iterruption and the man is forced to respond by emailing you and waiting until you feel like posting the so called response.

Ms. Joseph if the debate is so important that you proclain to be a cyber black board then why place the proverbial mask over the face of the women and grant them anonymity when they speak. But you disclose not only the name of the so called cheating man but also his picture. And if a women’s picture just happens to be posted because your black board allows it your site removes it.

I can answer both of these questions in short it is because your site is not interested in lively debate it is focused on the ill and pains that you have suffered from your failed relationships ( I know you got married at 18). It is unfortunate that you were unable to learn from those life lessons as most of us have. But instead you have disingenously learned to capitalize from the misery of others. This site has little to do about the rights of women but more to do with the monies that you receive in advertising dollars. ( i know about the houses in Los Angeles and Miami) If you were truly invested in womens right you would not have contemplated the companion site involving men.

My issue with your ideals are not merely focused upon the pain and misery that you have caused to my family, friends and peers but to the pains that you reap upon others that cannot fight back. The people who get up and work every ay to support what little they have. Have you no decency. Set the legal issues aside and tell the world which is now the platform for this discussion and say that you bear no moral responsibility for the lives that you have ruined as a result of this site..It seems that the dinner you had with your girl friends when you were bashing men which spawned the creation of this site would have been better spent looking within yourself and addressing your personal issues.

I never wanted this law suit. But life never gave me one nickel more than what my work and effort demanded and sometimes that fell short. But i never complained and i will not allow anyone to take from me what i have worked all my life to achieve.

You have engaged a determined man willing to lose everything for what he believes in and in the end regardless of what the courts say you can never repair the anxiety or pain that i am forced to live with as a result of your frivolous response to my simple request to be removed from your site.
Todd Jonathan Hollis, Plaintiff

Oh Todd, get over yourself. You as well as the other men on the sight, brought this on yourselves. It did not start with the owners of that sight. Look at it this way, you have now learned a lesson. Respect women, and do not do anything that may in the future embarrass yourself, your family, and your peers.

September 27, 2006
Tasha Joseph Loses Another Former Fan
Filed under: On the Cover
DontDateHimGirl should be renamed DontTrustTashaGirl  at least according to one of Web site founder Tasha Josephs former fans, Fonda Bryant.

This past summer Bryant, a single mother who lives in Raleigh, North Carolina, posted a disparaging profile on DDHG of a man named Dwayne whom she alleges cheated on her  that he was screwing around with his wife is not the issue at hand. Bryant says the process was therapeutic and sparked a pseudo-friendship with the Web site creator.

In August Joseph invited Bryant to appear alongside her as a guest on Dr. Phil. The hour-long show, which aired September 20, featured the DDHG creator and Todd Hollis, a Pittsburgh-based attorney who sued Joseph for defamation this past July, in a heated face-to-face discussion about the Website. Bryant agreed to act as a DDHG cheerleader, but to deter further publicly damaging her ex and her family, she asked Joseph to remove Dwaynes posting.

Joseph just ignored me, Bryant recalls, adding they had also planned to appear on The Ellen DeGeneres Show together. Im not trying to be spiteful, but I started to realize that Tasha was not the person I thought she was.

Upon returning home a few days later Bryant demanded, via email, that Joseph delete the entry. Indeed, email records show Joseph then alleged she had removed the posting. But Bryant claims she lied: I went online to check and it was sill there.

Joseph lied? No!

It was eventually removed, Bryant claims, more than seven days after her initial request. I havent heard from her since. She wont return messages or emails and I am now starting to think that she is exactly the kind of person Todd [Hollis] says she is.

Indeed, in New Times Blind Date feature about DDHG, Hollis alleged Joseph snubbed her nose at his request to remove a posting that described him as a diseased philanderer. Joseph offered a harsh rebuttal: Todd Hollis is a liar.

With all these lies, we understand it may be hard to keep track. So, lets recap: Joseph claims her former husband is a liar and she had no idea about his criminal background despite his contradicting testimony; Joseph claims she never served probation for grand theft and a Florida Department of Corrections spokesperson is also a liar, despite public record; Joseph claims Miami-Dade Clerk of Courts official records are lying by suggesting a man named John Jackson tried to get a restraining order against her; Joseph claims Todd Hollis is a cry-baby lawyer who lies about everything; and Joseph claims that New Times hires second-rate reporters and that, yes, they are also big fat liars.

That should clear things up.-Joanne Green

I guess were all lying now Tasha!

Wow, I really don’t care about this.

i think it’s long overdue. dated an IDIOT who is currently on line playing women for sympathy – and he’s got THREE, count them THREE PFAs!!!
something wrong with this picture?

you danmed well bet he’s goin up, baby!

what a poseur

Let’s see… is this the same John L. Jackson that is attempting to sell information about his relationship with Tasha Joseph, creator of DontDateHimGirl.com, was arrested 3 times in the 90’s for domestic violence against her. The Clerk of Court records in Miami tell the story of what kind of person he is. He tried to accuse her of a crime she didn’t commit when they were together. It was later determined by the State Attorney’s Office that he committed the crime. He’s also been convicted of numerous other crimes involving drug possession. He’s a lowlife who is so desperate for money that he is now attempting to sell information about his relationship with Tasha to anyone who will listen. Obviously, no one’s listening, except maybe fellow lowlife Todd Hollis! John and his brother Edward Chambers, a law school graduate who couldn’t pass the bar so he had to volunteer his services on Craig’s List, are like the boys from the movie Dumb and Dumber! Well, it’s the same thing that happens to all celebs. Look at the photographer who tried to extort money from Cameron Diaz over nude photos he took of her. Cameron stood up for herself and fought back and the photographer is now serving three years in jail!

Women need to wake up and realize that men like John L. Jackson are predators and if a successful woman like Tasha can be a victim, any woman can. Don’t fall victim to these men, ladies! There are good guys without lengthy criminal records out there who are honest, successful and drug-free!

Oh and the poster of the false article about Tasha must be the same Joanne Green from the tabloid rag Miami New Times who is being investigated by police in Miami for her role in an extortion attempt against Tasha made by John Jackson!

That should clear things up!

OMG! you expcte that kind of behavior from an ex but not a reporter – are they not supposed to be impartial or somethng that’s fucked up! she tried to get money from you? what an idiot?

Tasha the little lying check writing thief ($500.00) Who tried to expunge her past to hide her truth. Who posts anonymously and lives in the dark. Do u remember Robert Stephenson owner of the Fig Leaf. The restaurant where you wrote the fraudulent check. I remember him and ill bet he remembers you too. Little girl do u think u’ll be able to spin your way out of this? Your whole life has been about exposing others. what do you think the world will think of you when they know the truth about you and Juan or is it Courtney. I wonder what Todd will think when he hears this.
Your day is coming!

What the?

Don’t you people have your own email accounts?

I agree with MsParber! Get a life people! I wonder who “Fig Leaf” is? Is it Todd Hollis, Joanne Green, John Jackson or Ed Chambers? Which one of the sordid cast of characters is it? Do you guys have nothing better to do than post unsubstantiated crap about Tasha and try to sell your story on blogs all over the Internet? Get a life! A $500 check? Gimme a break people! If she’d been convicted of child abuse, murder or something like that, maybe people would give a crap, but $500 and no one even knows what happened. Sounds like the same guy who is trying to sell his story on these blogs, John Jackson, is behind it. Isn’t it a shame the way abusive men think they still have some sort of hold over the women they’ve abused? It’s great that Tasha isn’t taking it anymore and trying to help other women with her website!

That’s Mr. Sparber.

The lawsuit was dismissed…

Many consider the outcome of the lawsuit filed by Pittsburgh lawyer, Todd Hollis against Don’t Date Him Girl! owner, Tasha Joseph and the women who posted comments about him, a victory.

This really cannot be considered a “victory” because the battle was never fought! The judge simply did not “address” the issue because it was filed in the wrong venue. Since DDHG resides in Florida, the lawsuit should have been filed in Florida and not in Pennsylvania.

Seems to me that if Mr. Hollis is as self assured, arrogant and angry as he appeared on the Dr. Phil Show, he will most certainly file a new lawsuit against DDHG in the Sunshine State!

Yep being an asshole is an ugly and pathetic thing, and the people just think they won’t be addressed…whoever they are…it’s truly not gender based..but bravo to any site that brings facts to the table and let’s the loser who thinks he or she is “above the law” of morals be outed.

We all have had our share of “you must be kidding” kind of people…like Brad Pitt, they are missing the sensetivity chip…and it sucks putting time in when you are on the proper page, and they are out in left field thinking they are truly getting away with something…or most likely not thinking at all about anyone but themselves. “It’s all about me” is a common disease that runs rampant in our society…what a shame.

I think that it is dispicable for woman to be able to post comments and pictures anonymously. I am a woman, however, I do not think it is fair for the women to post these comments and not be held responsible for them. They are afforded the luxury of remaining anonymous meanwhile the men have their pictures posted and any number of accusations leveled against them whether they are true or false.
The comments made about my brother on Dontdatehimgirl.com are totally false and what the general viewing public does not know is that the woman who made the comments is a psychiatric patient who is delusional and confused. We have had to take a restraining order out against her, she found my parents number through 411 and has repeatedly called and harrassed them, she has gone to his work place and left nude pictures of herself with him manager for delivery, she had accused him of getting her pregnant even though he is physically incapable of impregnating anyone (turned out she was never pregnant), she has gone to the police and accused him of rape which was determined to be unfounded by the police who in turn advised my brother to get the restraining order.
So you see allowing scorned, delutional, women to accuse these men without the benefit of the men knowing who is accusing them it is wrong. We knew who posted the comments against my brother because of the one line in her comment that could be traced back to a converstion she had with my sister. It is wrong to slander someone without the opportunity for the accused to be able to defend themself. I think the website should require these women to post their name and pictures as well before allowing them to post their comments.

I had to make a comment, late and all – Anyone who know Troy, feels little sypathey for him. All of your preconceived notions about him are true. That’s why he will never win. The degree of his humilation matches the degradation he’s caused others, both male and female. I believe this experience has been a wake-up call, transformative in nature for him. From his posts, he understands morality and considering the feelings of other – something he was totally unaware of before this situation. Sistah girl is an imposter. Any women kows, and men can verify, that we are the topic of many water cooler conversations. Have been for centuries. Now, women have a venue/recourse and we are slanderous bitches. Only a real “bitch ass” would even care about a discussion of his sexuality; confidence is a defining factor of masculinity. Most men would feel the posts an attribute. They love the attention which is why they’ve spread their dna so thin. Stop being a bitch Todd!

This is [i]awesome[/i]!

Why is Todd a bitch? And what’s Tasha’s back story?

Let’s get it all aired out here, in the caring eyes of the public.

Then the healing can begin. At long last, it can finally begin.

I think this was the thread upon which I was first called Ms. Parber. Ah, memories.

I love threads like this and don’t know why I was complaining earlier. I hope men come here to plead sypathey for their friends for decades to come.

In the meanwhile, I wonder if I’m related to Danny “Dirtbag” Sparber.

I resolve to create a character in some future fiction named Maxine Sparber, probably a school teacher, since teachers are the most likely to be called “Ms.” anymore.

“Ms. Sparber! Ms. Sparber!”
“Yes, Rex?”

Ooh. This is going to be good!

I love the nicknames, but not as much as those that probably posted about themselves.

Sweet.

MR. SPARBER — this may be the greatest thread ever. Please do not delete.

I saw this site a couple of years ago and saw a friend of mine on it when searching for MPLS. Kind of creeped me out. I didn’t know their circumstances as a couple, but I did see him recently after many years and was all “professional” on him as a result. Now, I feel not so good about that because I have no proof of the accusations. But his being listed on this site jaded me against him…but is it real? Does he even know he’s on it?

Hmm…

OMG, I’ve been reading this site for about an hour now…I’m sure a few of the guys I went out with are on this…heh.

Andrew…oooh, juicy! Now I wanna know!