<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Latest Rage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135</link>
	<description>Minneapolis + St. Paul</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:11:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14040</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14040</guid>
		<description>ok chong, i get u.  &quot;randian&quot; is a bit much i guess, i have a habit of ripping into folks...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i&#039;m no economist, but there is some work out there abt the limitations of the inviz hand, that it can only select for efficiency among the choices history has given it: the metaphor is a road built on a curve btw two points. obv it&#039;s the fastest way between them, and rebuilding the road straight isn&#039;t in anyone&#039;s immediate capital interest, so long term inefficency is built in to the short-term best choice.  so, voila: the road to energy has a toll both staffed by 30,000 mendacious sanctimonious drunk bedouins...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok chong, i get u.  &#8220;randian&#8221; is a bit much i guess, i have a habit of ripping into folks&#8230;</p>
<p>i&#8217;m no economist, but there is some work out there abt the limitations of the inviz hand, that it can only select for efficiency among the choices history has given it: the metaphor is a road built on a curve btw two points. obv it&#8217;s the fastest way between them, and rebuilding the road straight isn&#8217;t in anyone&#8217;s immediate capital interest, so long term inefficency is built in to the short-term best choice.  so, voila: the road to energy has a toll both staffed by 30,000 mendacious sanctimonious drunk bedouins&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chonger</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14025</link>
		<dc:creator>Chonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14025</guid>
		<description>Dave, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My main point was that we will NOT have a sudden disappearance of oil.  Rather, IF it were to run out, it would a drawn out process and would surely take longer than five years.  Over that time the price of oil would slowly inch upwards.  The further it inches upwards, the more incentive there is for someone to come up with a cheaper alternative energy source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But we do have some common ground- I drive a fuel efficient car.  It&#039;s because I&#039;m a cheapskate, not an environmentalist, but it has the same effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chonger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. Geoff, I&#039;m no Randian.  Also, it&#039;s clear that the Saudis are propped up by governments, which is no failure of the invisible hand. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, </p>
<p>My main point was that we will NOT have a sudden disappearance of oil.  Rather, IF it were to run out, it would a drawn out process and would surely take longer than five years.  Over that time the price of oil would slowly inch upwards.  The further it inches upwards, the more incentive there is for someone to come up with a cheaper alternative energy source.</p>
<p>But we do have some common ground- I drive a fuel efficient car.  It&#8217;s because I&#8217;m a cheapskate, not an environmentalist, but it has the same effect.</p>
<p>Chonger</p>
<p>P.S. Geoff, I&#8217;m no Randian.  Also, it&#8217;s clear that the Saudis are propped up by governments, which is no failure of the invisible hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14008</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14008</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised it took 29 comments before our dependence on foreign oil was mentioned.... Is this a big issue (Chonger, et al)? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised it took 29 comments before our dependence on foreign oil was mentioned&#8230;. Is this a big issue (Chonger, et al)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fkaJames</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14012</link>
		<dc:creator>fkaJames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14012</guid>
		<description>The point some here are dancing around is the lifetime ownership cost of an automobile.  Take a $20K auto that gets 18 mpg that you drive for 12,000 miles per year for 10 years (I&#039;m trying ot use something close to an average here, so you can increase or reduce your guess at your own cost in comparison).  If you finance it over 4 years and put 20% down ($4K), it costs you $22.4K to own it, plus $1.5K in gasoline per year (at $2.25/gallon).  It also will cost you $1K per year in maintenance and, say, $0.8K per year in insurance and taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add it all up, and you&#039;re paying $22.4K (ownership) + $15K (fuel) + 10K (maintenance) + $8K (insurance/tax) = $55.4K to own this vehicle for 10 years, or $5.5K per year.  This is oversimplified, of course, because it doesn&#039;t take into account (a) time value of money (except for pmt @ 7%), (b) accidents, (c) rising costs of fuel and insurance, or (d) salvage value at year 11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But you get the drift.  Your $20K car costs you about $7.5K your first year of ownership, and over $55K for 10 years of ownership.  At the end of 10, you maybe could get $1.5K for it, if you&#039;ve treated it well with no accidents.  What a deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point some here are dancing around is the lifetime ownership cost of an automobile.  Take a $20K auto that gets 18 mpg that you drive for 12,000 miles per year for 10 years (I&#8217;m trying ot use something close to an average here, so you can increase or reduce your guess at your own cost in comparison).  If you finance it over 4 years and put 20% down ($4K), it costs you $22.4K to own it, plus $1.5K in gasoline per year (at $2.25/gallon).  It also will cost you $1K per year in maintenance and, say, $0.8K per year in insurance and taxes.</p>
<p>Add it all up, and you&#8217;re paying $22.4K (ownership) + $15K (fuel) + 10K (maintenance) + $8K (insurance/tax) = $55.4K to own this vehicle for 10 years, or $5.5K per year.  This is oversimplified, of course, because it doesn&#8217;t take into account (a) time value of money (except for pmt @ 7%), (b) accidents, (c) rising costs of fuel and insurance, or (d) salvage value at year 11.</p>
<p>But you get the drift.  Your $20K car costs you about $7.5K your first year of ownership, and over $55K for 10 years of ownership.  At the end of 10, you maybe could get $1.5K for it, if you&#8217;ve treated it well with no accidents.  What a deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14005</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14005</guid>
		<description>chonger i wish i could feel as comforted by randian anti-chicken-littlism, but there a few facts that markets can&#039;t make go away: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;personal transportation is the last stop for energy consumption; we have to recompute those costs into everything else: anything that gets trucked, anything that gets flown (flown?? er flied? you know), all farming (incl the machines and the fertilizers), anything with a plastic part or carried in one. energy costs are a drag on every element of the economy, not just folks driving around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;no other source of energy is as efficent or productive as petroluem.  there are, frankly, NO alternatives, nothing works as well.  it won&#039;t just &quot;run out&quot; one day, it&#039;s becoming increasingly (and at some point, prohibitavely) expensive to get out of the ground--and no other source can really pick up the slack.  it&#039;s not just a matter of switching but of living &amp; working with less energy, period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;in the meantime, the bottom piece of the whole economic jenga game is the saudi royal family.  the invisible hand hasn&#039;t fixed them yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(oh and i drive a big olds my late grandma gave me.  everywhere.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chonger i wish i could feel as comforted by randian anti-chicken-littlism, but there a few facts that markets can&#8217;t make go away: </p>
<p>personal transportation is the last stop for energy consumption; we have to recompute those costs into everything else: anything that gets trucked, anything that gets flown (flown?? er flied? you know), all farming (incl the machines and the fertilizers), anything with a plastic part or carried in one. energy costs are a drag on every element of the economy, not just folks driving around.</p>
<p>no other source of energy is as efficent or productive as petroluem.  there are, frankly, NO alternatives, nothing works as well.  it won&#8217;t just &#8220;run out&#8221; one day, it&#8217;s becoming increasingly (and at some point, prohibitavely) expensive to get out of the ground&#8211;and no other source can really pick up the slack.  it&#8217;s not just a matter of switching but of living &#038; working with less energy, period.</p>
<p>in the meantime, the bottom piece of the whole economic jenga game is the saudi royal family.  the invisible hand hasn&#8217;t fixed them yet.</p>
<p>(oh and i drive a big olds my late grandma gave me.  everywhere.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14004</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14004</guid>
		<description>Okay, you&#039;ve got me on Erlich vs. Simon (which I hadn&#039;t heard of).  But five years sounds kind of optimistic to me to get our shit together if we all suddenly have to drastically change our lifestyles to account for a shift in the way we get our energy.  At the very least, it sounds like an awfully painful five-year transition (if it really could be handled that quickly) that could be eased a little bit by thinking ahead now rather than wait for the consequences later.  i.e., start buying more efficient cars now, show city governments there&#039;s a public interest in better mass transit, etc.  Maybe there&#039;s some hysterics at the fringe which you refer to as the &quot;chicken littles,&quot; but I think most of us are more in line with just being careful rather than insist that &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; oil consumption is inherently bad and destroying the earth as we know it.  I just think concern about consumption right here and now is well justified, and I have more admiration for those people who trade in their car for a bike than for those who just consume irresponsibly.  Do we have some common ground at least?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, you&#8217;ve got me on Erlich vs. Simon (which I hadn&#8217;t heard of).  But five years sounds kind of optimistic to me to get our shit together if we all suddenly have to drastically change our lifestyles to account for a shift in the way we get our energy.  At the very least, it sounds like an awfully painful five-year transition (if it really could be handled that quickly) that could be eased a little bit by thinking ahead now rather than wait for the consequences later.  i.e., start buying more efficient cars now, show city governments there&#8217;s a public interest in better mass transit, etc.  Maybe there&#8217;s some hysterics at the fringe which you refer to as the &#8220;chicken littles,&#8221; but I think most of us are more in line with just being careful rather than insist that <i>all</i> oil consumption is inherently bad and destroying the earth as we know it.  I just think concern about consumption right here and now is well justified, and I have more admiration for those people who trade in their car for a bike than for those who just consume irresponsibly.  Do we have some common ground at least?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chonger</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14003</link>
		<dc:creator>Chonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14003</guid>
		<description>Dave,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is that the chicken littles are consistently wrong about their predictions of long term supply shortage.  Perhaps you have heard of the famous bet between Paul Erlich and Julian Simon?  Unless you think oil resources will dry up in the space of a year, or even five years, there is plenty of time for the market to respond to the need for alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have some faith!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chonger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>The fact is that the chicken littles are consistently wrong about their predictions of long term supply shortage.  Perhaps you have heard of the famous bet between Paul Erlich and Julian Simon?  Unless you think oil resources will dry up in the space of a year, or even five years, there is plenty of time for the market to respond to the need for alternatives.</p>
<p>Have some faith!</p>
<p>Chonger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14001</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14001</guid>
		<description>Your HTML has been fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your HTML has been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-14002</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14002</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in Canada where we drive a smart and an Odyssey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The smart has more room in the front than the Odyssey but you got to be a people person.  Every time you stop people want to talk about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Took the smart on a 800 mile trip last week.  It was great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in Canada where we drive a smart and an Odyssey.</p>
<p>The smart has more room in the front than the Odyssey but you got to be a people person.  Every time you stop people want to talk about it.</p>
<p>Took the smart on a 800 mile trip last week.  It was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.secretsofthecity.com/mnspeak/8135#comment-13999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13999</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;d like to apologize for not closing the &lt;i&gt; tag.  Very irresponsible of me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;d like to apologize for not closing the &lt;i&gt; tag.  Very irresponsible of me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
