Comments on: Politics in Minnesota: 10.17.07

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:25:49 +0000

Not always possible.

Don't forget too, that in many of these cases, it's people that can't get insurance at ANY price.

Someone in the family gets cancer? You'll never get an individual policy.

By: baker.

baker. — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:15:52 +0000

So, what, retroactive abortion for the last two born? Maybe you have the kids draw straws?

Or move somewhere where you can effectively support your family?.

By: Kevin angry enough to comment again

Kevin angry enough to comment again — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:48:18 +0000

F*ckballs, just click here.

By: kevin

kevin — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:47:38 +0000

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:27:57 +0000

Maybe that can be the next season of Survivor

By: josie

josie — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:03:47 +0000

Well, that’s a surefire way to settle the endless debate of who Mom and Dad like best.

By: not kevin

not kevin — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:01:40 +0000

Shucks, back in Iowa 82k would make you a millionaire no matter how many kids the lord sees fit to give you.

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:59:31 +0000

So, what, retroactive abortion for the last two born? Maybe you have the kids draw straws?

By: baker.

baker. — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:39:19 +0000

I'm afraid I have to agree with Kevin here, Wayne.
If you are needing more than 82,000 dollars to support and insure a family, perhaps you should move out of Midtown and over to Wiliamsburg. And if you find that you can't support 4 children, you should have had only 2!

By: mnblrmkr

mnblrmkr — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:48:51 +0000

I do know that if I lived in California, I wouldn’t be able to by an individual policy at any price.