Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

The Read Menace

Mnemonic Devices and the Governor of the Week

I'm not a little disappointed that the charges against Governor Rod Blagojevich of Illinois who purported to sell Barack Obama's Senate seat to the highest bidder have pushed the recent transgressions of Governor Tim Pawlenty out of the news, even here in Minnesota.

As anyone who has a television knows, Blagojevich has a name that's hard to pronounce. Every pundit seems to have a different way of mangling his name. I just want to offer a suggestion. As Katie Couric learned to pronounce Ahmadinejad by remembering the phrase "I'm a dinner jacket," I suggest you learn to pronounce Blagojevich by remembering the phrase "I'm a douchebag with a bad haircut."

As for pronouncing Pawlenty, let me suggest the phrase, "I used to have a mullet, which was useful for getting elected in Minnesota, but now I've recently cut my hair differently to signal that I now have national aspirations, but, don't worry, I still have a hockey player's understanding of economics."

If you think that's a little long, how about, "I'll say really stupid stuff to fire up the base. Hey, it worked for that bimbo from Wasilla." Or, if that's still too long, "Balanced Budget Amendment."

For that's the new device for remembering just how banal this guy is. "Mullet" just won't sum him up any more. In case you missed it, and you probably did, "BBA" just wrote a piece for Politico.com, the web site for people who just can't get enough politics, called "Cut Up the Credit Card" in which he calls for a balanced budget amendment to the US Constitution.

I could be wrong, but I don't think such a stupid idea for a constitutional amendment has come out of Minnesota since Prohibition.

BBA's startling essay, (which, in BBA's defense, was probably written for him by Phil Krinkie,) includes such memorable laughers as "free market solutions for better health care" and mentioning "our [Republican] approach" and "energy independence" in the same sentence. Even more hilarious was blaming Wall Street for the current crisis and then forgetting to mention who paid for his party's policy of not regulating said den of iniquity.

Anyone who has had the first course in college economics knows that BBA's quaint image of a family sitting around the table and making the decision not to go to Maui or buy the plasma this year has nothing to do with how to handle the country's problems of massive unemployment, no health care, crumbling infrastructure and political and financial corruption. In fact, the college I went to required two economics courses-macro and micro economics-so that even an eighteen-year-old freshman would know the difference between John Maynard Keynes and Joe the Plumber...and why it's a good idea to spend during a recession and to subject plumbers (and bankers) to regulation.

One commentator said BBA had "a child-like understanding" of economics. I think that's giving him too much credit. What he really has is a child-like understanding of what it takes to fool people into voting for him-that is, that we're all stupid. Here's a clue Tim: you've been elected a couple of times because you've had the great good fortune to run in a time when the DFL has been even lamer than you. Remember, the last time Minnesotans really had a choice, we elected Jesse Ventura. That should take a little shine off your helmet hair, if you stopped to think about it for a minute.

So, all in all, I'm going to go with Blagojevich as my governor of the week. He may be corrupt, but I think I prefer that to cynical, stupid and arrogant. I also like his hair better.

Sarah Palin, Sock Puppet. Coincidence that they have the same initials?

The McCain campaign has taken Obama to task for supposedly saying Sarah Palin will do what she's told. I can't say whether anyone really said that Palin will do what she's told, but the evidence of her appearance with Charlie Gibson on ABC certainly suggests she SAYS what she's told.

When Gibson asked her if she would back Israel if Israel were to attack Iran's nuclear facilities she said, "I don’t think that we should second-guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves."

In fact, she's so anxious to not "second guess" Israel -- or her handlers' talking points -- she repeated it three times. Here's how it went:

GIBSON: What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?

PALIN: Well, first, we are friends with Israel and I don't think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves and for their security.

GIBSON: So if we wouldn't second guess it and they decided they needed to do it because Iran was an existential threat, we would cooperate or agree with that.

PALIN: I don't think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation.

GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right.

PALIN: We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.


What was amazing to me is that she repeated the lines so effortlessly, and I couldn't even detect Karl Rove's hand up her back.

So, now we know we have a person who can memorize things, and who believes what she's told, (as if her creationist pronouncements weren't evidence enough of that). We also know that McCain has picked a "running mate" as opposed to a Vice President. Do you want Palin up against Vladimir Putin, when her understanding of Russia is this?

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

One thing is sure. Rove didn't give her that line. She thought that up all by herself, which is even more terrifying.

The Wisdom of the Car Buying Masses

Just when I thought it was safe to cancel my Strib subscription, they surprise me and put something on the front page that actually 1) contains information that I care about; 2) contains information that elucidates a larger story; and 3) nudges at least one piece of television-like spot news dreck out of the paper. (Actually, I’m only guessing about point number 3.)

Today, there was a good piece by Dee DePass about the slump in car buying in the Twin Cities. It seems new car and truck buying was down 14.5 percent last year. Used car sales were also down—by 12 percent.

Of course, these were sales by dealers, and if there’s one thing we should have learned over the past few years is that we don’t need dealers anymore of almost any type. We have the internet, and sites like Carsoup and Craig’s List, make it a lot easier to sell your car yourself and cut out the dealer’s commission.

So, perhaps the numbers are a little skewed, but a table accompanying the story gives some detail that is relevant. (Sorry if you read the story online. The table wasn’t attached to the online version of the story. Is there a worse web site in the world than the Strib’s?)

The table showed basically that the sales of American brands are down, for the most part, 15 to 20 percent. On the other hand, Toyotas, Hondas, Volkswagens, and other efficient foreign models were up. Not down less than Americans. Their sales were actually higher.

Is there anything to be inferred from this? I’m going to go out on a limb and say Americans have wised up way faster than their automobile company executives and noticed that gas prices are rising and are making adjustments such as buying smaller more efficient cars.

This is a roundabout way of getting to presidential politics. Recently, both Hillary Clinton and John McCain have called for a temporary reduction of the gas tax. Because of course, we want to do everything we can to encourage Americans to drive more, take no responsibility either on the personal or political front for the idiocy of our national energy policy, and just keep paying out to our pals in Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.

This at the same time as they laughingly call for a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. It just gets funnier.

No Surprise Here, UnitedHealth Rides Again

It's not any surprise to those who've followed the sordid history of UnitedHealth Group to see that the company is being sued by the Attorney General of New York for manipulating the reimbursement rates for their insured who go outside of the network for their care.

It seems United reimburses its customers based on a formula which calculates the "customary" charges for services in the New York area. Of course, the "customary" charges are calculated by a third party. In this case a company called Ingenix, which happens to be owned by UnitedHealth.

An investigation by the state showed that a "customary" charge for a doctor visit in New York City was $200. Ingenix said it was $77. I don't know if any of you have been to the doctor lately, but the charge in Minneapolis passed $77 quite some time ago. I'm fairly certain that I read somewhere that New York is more expensive to live in than Minneapolis.

As NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said, “We believe there was an industrywide scheme perpetuated by some of the nation’s largest health insurers to deceive and defraud consumers.”

Ya think?

 

...leaving community hurt, too

Here's the headline from yesterday's Strib: "Girl, 6, is grazed by bullet, leaving community hurt, too."

It's tempting just to let that stand as one more blob in the insipid lump of goo that is the Star Tribune. OK, I will, but with just one comment: Doesn't every bullet that hits a six-year-old hurt our community?

I wish I had such an overstaffed news room that I could send a reporter out to the scene of a shooting to ask everyone who lives near the incident what they think of a little girl getting shot. What do they expect people to say? "Hey, no big deal. People get shot here all the time. What really makes me mad is the Twins letting Johan Santana get away."

Actually, there was one detail of the Strib story that's kind of funny. The assailant's gun went off because his pants were so loose that the gun slipped down his pants leg and discharged when it hit the floor. How much funnier would the headline have been if the gun had hit with the muzzle pointed straight up?

"Man, 20 or so, grazed by bullet, leaving future generations hurt, too."

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff