Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

The Three Pointer: The Last, Best Weekend

Share

AP Photo by Nikki Boertman

Game #79, Road Game #39: Minnesota 102, Orlando 101

Game #80, Road Game #40, Minnesota 114, Memphis 105

Season Record: 21-59

1. Wanting It More

It does not significantly diminish the two wins posted this weekend by the Timberwolves by pointing out that neither Orlando nor Memphis bothered to be particularly resilient or really dedicate themselves to "the old college try." The Magic have a #3 seed in the east sewn up and didn't seem especially distraught about allowing the Wolves to overcome a 9-point deficit in the final 4:23 of the game. The Grizzlies rested outside sniper Mike Miller (bad back) and benched their top two centers, Darko Milicic and Jason Collins (each DNP-CD) to get a longer look at the small (6-9) youngster Andre Brown in the pivot. Such are the vagaries of late-season hoops. Consider that the previous two years, the Wolves themselves bent over backwards to move the clicker upwards in the loss column.

By contrast, the Wolves weathered a blistering 3-point shooting performance by Orlando in the first half and overcame the Magic with a balanced scoring (abetted by riding their most highly-touted quintet of the future at crunchtime) and more diligent defense; then blew Memphis out with a franchise-record 43-point first quarter and their most dominating performance of the season on the boards. What these things have in common--the resilience, the ball movement, the rebounds, the defense--is an abiding desire to win. It has been awhile since this team was demonstrably hungier than its opponent for two successive games.

Let's focus in on the pivotal movements of both games. After playing cat-and-mouse with the Wolves with a lead that fluctuated from 4 to 14 since the first 90 seconds of the game, Orlando and Minnesota each made key substitutions with 8:18 to go and the Magic up 5, 91-86. For Minnesota, it was Al Jefferson in for Chris Richard, giving the Wolves a lineup that includes their last three first-round picks--McCants, Foye, Brewer--and arguably their top two players this season, Jefferson and Gomes. Somewhat remarkably, despite the frequency with which the Wolves play smallball, this particular quintet does not even rank among the top 20 most-frequent five-man units this season for Minnesota (according to 82games.com), which means it hadn't even mustered 36 minutes up this point.

Well, for the final 8:18 they stayed intact, and the result was a 16-10 margin, including 12-2 over that last 4:23. A primary reason for this disparity was Stan Van Gundy's decision to sub in Jameer Nelson for Carlos Arroyo instead of Keyon Dooling, giving the Foye-McCants backcourt a substantial physical mismatch versus Nelson (6-1, 190) and Dooling (6-3, 195)--especially when you consider that the Magic flank the beastly Dwight Howard with a pair of 6-10 swingmen (Rashard Lewis and Hedo Turkoglu) and throw the 6-5, 220 Maurice Evans in the backcourt as starters.

Consequently, the Wolves were able to rally despite zero field goals from Jefferson, who went 0-4 from the floor while the rest of his teammates registered 10-18, including 4-4 from beyond the arc, two apiece by Foye and McCants, who played together over the last 17 minutes. For that matter, Foye played the entire second half, and all but 34 seconds of the entire last three periods, leading the team in points (25, on 10-21 FG) and assists (6). With Jefferson otherwise engaged with the giant speciment named Howard, Foye went off for a dozen 4th quarter points, McCants added 8--but more significantly, hit a vital crunchtime trey to bring the Wolves to within a point with 1:17 left to play. This was right after the Wolves looked doomed by a sequence where Ryan Gomes clanked a wide open jumper and Turkoglu drove the left lane for a layup. It was also the last field goal of the game. The Wolves' defense clamped down, the Magic, worried about Howard getting fouled and missing free throws, chose to have Dooling and Turkoglu miss out side jumpers, and the game came down to a scrum where the Wolves battled for an offensive rebound that eventually fell to Gomes. Howard fouled him with 2 seconds on the clock. Whatever Gomes's difficulties with jumpers with the game on the line, he's money from the free throw stripe--swish, and swish. Ballgame, Minnesota.

Still riding the high of their first road victory of the season against an Eastern Conference team, the Wolves ensured that there would be no drama in the game against the Grizz. They purely and simply blew out Memphis in the first period, led by Kirk Snyder, whose four turnovers and minus -14 in less than 25 minutes of play against Orlando stood in stark contrast to Corey Brewer's fine outing. Against Memphis, he went hard to the hole, scoring nine points on a putback layup, dunk, and a driving layup, plus three FTs. Meanwhile, the Wolves doubled up the Grizzlies (who made the smallball Minnesota squad look rather large with their pipsqueak lineup) on the boards, 20-10. That set the tone, which had the Wolves racking up a monstrous 21 *offensive* rebounds in the first three periods alone, finishing with 62 boards overall. Four players--Jefferson, Gomes, Snyder and Brewer, had double-digit rebounding totals. McCants was again a deadeye from outside. The final 9-point margin really wasn't that close.

2. The Return of Corey Brewer

How long has it been since you were excited about Brewer's NBA future--a month? Six weeks? I daresay the same might be said of Brewer's own outlook. But, as will probably always be the case with Brewer, he rekindled his nearly snuffed confidence with defense on Friday, particularly in the final 6:58 of the second period. It started with a steal of Arroyo and floor length drive culminating in two free throws. Then he went high flying sidewise to block Arroyo's open court layup attempt a few minutes later, stuck a jumper after that, and filched the ball from Howard and generated another layup in the final minute of the period. Bottom line, in the second quarter alone, Brewer had 8 points, 4 boards (two offensive), two steals and a block. No doubt it helped that he and his former Gator college teammate Richard both had dozens of friends in the stands down in Florida. In any event, shaking off all those weeks of bad ju ju, he carried over the old Brewer hustle into the Grizzlies game and racked up 11 rebounds to give him 20 in less than 52 minutes of play his last two contests, along with four steals. Yes, he can get overamped--he fouled out against Memphis and had moments versus Orlando where he was ball-dogging a player who wasn't his man--but when that enthusiasm is productive, he can flash back to the steals and blocks and boards rather than those hideous misses that have marred his play before then.

3. Quick Hits

Chris Richard also had dug his niche a little deeper as the backup center with a pair of nice games over the weekend. While it remains possible that Richard will become this year's Bracey Wright--a kid with a flash of promise honing everything he can out of his game who just doesn't have NBA ability in the long run--his attitude and work ethic have been a joy to behold this entire season.

Another second-rounder who constantly works hard at refining aspects of his play--Craig Smith--has not been missed at all the past two games, which could help make some signing decisions a little easier in the off-season.

During the trey for the Milwaukee finale, I'll announce a couple of playoff games or series in advance that I'll be covering along with delivering my choices for various awards, and guessing the winners of the first round matchups. If we can keep this beautiful conversation going into the postseason, I'm game.

21 Reader Comments

Rascal Flatts (not verified)07:52pm
Apr 13
Thanks for the write-up Britt. Richard is going to stick around because he's a big, unlike Bracey. His ability to take up space, rebound, and generally play smart basketball is invaluable. Unfortunately his offensive limitations will never allow him to be a 20+ minute per game player, but he's definitely a valuable contributor as a backup. Good to see Brew end strong....This kid could be the X-factor for us over the next couple of seasons. There have been stretches, albeit few and far between, where he has truly been a disruptive presence on both ends of the floor. I can't wait to watch him in the summer league again to see what kind of strides he makes with his body and game over the next few months.
timmuggs (not verified)08:01pm
Apr 13
Whew, another 3ptr. Thanks, Britt, I was going through withdrawal and getting desperate. I like the play of Snyder. I like what Brewer has done the last two games. Nice that Foye & Shaddy have also stepped up, but I'd rather keep Foye & Snyder. We know what Big Al's defense is like, and to compete at the highest level, we need guys around him that are good defensively. That means we keep Brewer & Snyder, and maybe convert Foye and/or Shaddy into a defensive minded center. Good thing they are all playing well at the end of the season, helps our options. But then, I know less about the game than any other poster here, so be gentle with me in your replies.
Dr.K (not verified)08:10pm
Apr 13
I have quietly been hoping that some strange synergy would take place that would allow Foye and McCants to be on the floor together so that we can all ramp down our Foye versus McCants arguments. But I've held out little hope that it could happen. This last stretch of games makes me think that it can. I think the Foye/McCants/Brewer/Gomes/Jefferson group is where McHale and Whitman want to go, lacking a superior catch in the draft. Personally, I fear that we will take Love, and that he will be the second coming of Big Country Reeve, or Mayo, and the logjam he creates will set us back. I'm curious as to whether anyone else sees promise for the Foye/McCants duo in the backcourt. I know all the issues -- no natural point, McCants is jack-happy, weak defense on fast points, etc., etc. What I want to know if anyone who has watched closely thinks these two have any potential chemistry together. Something somewhere inside me just makes me think that the two of them together might be better than the sum of their parts. Any takers?
Rascal Flatts (not verified)08:51pm
Apr 13
The fact is these guys are in the + category as a player pair according to 82games.com and their 3-point shooting prowess stretches the D. I'm much less worried about their synergies on offense than I am about their D. To me it's a matter of consistently playing defense and playing smart basketball. If those two can get that end of the floor right, most people's worries about their compatibility will disappear.
Andy G (not verified)09:14am
Apr 14
I'd like the pair more if either: A) McCants moved without the ball. I think part of the reason the Billups combo guard thing works so well in D-Town is that Hamilton moves without the ball as well as anyone in the league. Chauncey doesn't have to be a natural playmaker to get assists to Rip, since Rip is creating everything by running off screens; or B) Foye learns how to play like a natural point. This is the less-likely to happen. I think it's hard to teach somebody how to lose their pure scorer mentality, and equally difficult to teach them how to survey the floor and consistently be two steps ahead of defensive adjustments. As it is, they are both solid players, and with the right front line, they could maybe form part of a good--but not great--starting five. That front line is currently not on this club.
Aaron Couch (not verified)05:33pm
Apr 14
dr. k, i am so in agreement with you. there is no need to take love as you already have your backcourt in foye and mccants. the chemistry is there if you just let it happen. people think mccants is jack happy, but if you look at him playing he does pass and move the ball around. he is just so effective as a scorer that he can put up points in bunches. to bring in another guard is asinine. you already have your core as you stated and they have proven that they can win. just bring in a big man and let some other people go and create the chemistry that you need based on the draft picks that you already have. derek rose is good, however, he is not a natural point guard and i would rather stay with what i have then keep pushing the table back.
Xand (not verified)11:12am
Apr 15
Sorry Aaron, but I have to ask in what world Rose isn't a natural point. All he did this year was run his team by taking what the defense gave him and not forcing the issue, a pretty impressive feat in this day and age given his youth and the siren's call to show off one's scoring abilities. He may not have the vision of a Jason Kidd, but he's most definitely a pure point, and when you take into account what else he brings to the table (size, athleticism, defense, rebounding) his passing ability is more than adequate to be a successful point in the NBA. I also vehemently disagree with the notion that you take a big man because you have too many guards. You pick the best player you possibly can, even if it's a 2 guard (Mayo) or a scoring PF (Beasley) and let the rest work itself out. The only time you draft on need is if there are two guys on the same level as prospects or you think your team is a specific piece away from contending, aside from that, in my opinion you're just asking to become the Hawks of the West. To Wim - if I'm not out watching the draft at a bar somewhere I'll definitely pop on IRC to chat with you. Cross your fingers everyone, let's will some luck our way (for once!).
gjk (not verified)09:27pm
Apr 13
Good posts on Brewer -- no matter what the reasons, there's still hope. One thing that's concerned me is how awkward his shooting form is. To me, it seems like he'd be better off as more of a set shooter because of his height and wingspan. Players with similar bodies to his barely use their legs when shooting and often extend upward as fully as possible. Maybe there's too much movement going on in the lower body.
tha_phenom (not verified)03:02pm
Apr 14
He'll need to work on his set shot because it is head and shoulders below his pull up jumper. It seems like the only shots he makes anymore is off the dribble, which is nice because thats a tougher shot to perfect.
gjk (not verified)10:42pm
Apr 14
I'm not saying he has strong legs or that shooting is in the upper body. What I'm saying is that most "long" players (from Scottie Pippen to Josh Howard) jump straight up and down and extend with their arms. They don't need to jump as high and use a higher arc and more spin on the ball. Brewer crouches more and pushes his legs out, which means more movement without an improvement in results. He needs to get stronger, but he also has to use his height and wingspan to his advantage.
Andy B (not verified)03:57pm
Apr 14
I think it is the opposite problem. Actually, Brewer's form is not that bad. But, I really believe his shooting is tied to his lack of strength. I think he is built like a marathon runner and he can run, run, run. However, his body has to rest sometimes. He might hit a higher percentage off the dribble because he is entering his shot from a crouched position and is using his legs to power the shot upward. Most of the strength in shooting a basketball comes from the lower body and not the upper. I think he doesn't have the leg strength to hit his shot, while using up his energy in the way he plays. When he tires he doesn't use his legs enough to get the ball up. He needs to seriously address this lack of strength by hitting the weights this offseason and building up his leg strength. He has toothpicks for legs.
Patrick (not verified)11:03pm
Apr 14
My take on Brewer's shot is that there is a problem with his form. It isn't that the shot looks bad; his upper body - his arms, in particular - are in the proper position. But he misuses his legs. Rather than bending at the knees and using his legs to square up, get balance, and generate power for his shot, Brewer looks like he sits down: he pushes his butt out and almost locks his knees, which eliminates any good push and balance that he could get if he used his legs properly. As a result, his shot is consistently flat regardless of whether he is misfiring short or long. I would think that a good shooting coach could correct this. Part of it is mental - he has to "unlearn" a bad habit and be able to execute a new "good habit" during game situations - and part of it is obviously physical. Anyway, I hope Corey can show a lot of improvement on offense next year. He is one of my favorite players because of his hustle, determination, and energy (which, by the way, I think is one of the most overused terms in NBA circles, but which actually applies well to Corey's game). He could become a very valuable player on a good team.
Andy B (not verified)08:13am
Apr 15
I like Corey, too. I agree with everything you say. My only disagreement is that strength training will do as much to correct his form as coaching. He is bending too much at the knees because thats what he has to do to generate power. He needs to add muscle in his legs to get more lift and power from his legs without the deep knee bend.
Wim (Belgium) (not verified)02:31am
Apr 14
Hope I'm not out of line with this... As the season's end is getting closer I'm hoping we could all get together again on draft night. After all, draft night is a bit like Christmas, it's only merry if you've got someone to share it with. So I've set up a little IRC chat channel where we can all meet the evening of the draft to discuss whats going on that day. Especially with our beloved Timberwolves... Maybe you could include this info in the last 3pointer Britt? I know you're not a draft junkie but the evening of the draft ... that should be fun. For the people who have their own IRC client installed and know how it works: server: DALnet channel: #draftnight time: +- 1hour before the draft For the ones who have no knowledge of IRC (or the ones who want to laugh at my geeky voice and crummy english with dutch accent) I've set up this little video on how to install a free IRC client and how to join the draftnight chat channel... http://upload.ispi.be/Files/DraftNightwithTheRake.avi Hope to see y'all there. (gonna read the 3pointer later as I've got a meeting now ^^)
Wim (Belgium) (not verified)02:33am
Apr 14
In my haste I forgot to mention: if you would need extra help in setting up the client, I'm available through e-mail on w0lvenclaw@hotmail.com (no messenger there, it's an old adress, since this is a public forum and all...)
Jerry (not verified)08:08am
Apr 14
I've mentioned this before, but I want to keep our hope alive for a top draft choice. By playing hard and winning these games at the end of the year, the Timberwolves are pleasing the Karma Gods. Therefore, Karma will reward them with either the first or second pick on draft night.
Nate (not verified)09:32am
Apr 14
Has anyone else noticed that Foye's midrange jumper seems to have returned? He was rarely, if ever, taking the midrange jump shot this season, but I noticed that it made a rather prominent return in both games this weekend. The midrange shot would seem to be an important weapon for Foye as it opens up space for his three point shot and for drives to the lane. Hopefully he'll work on this even more in the offseason as I remember seeing it more last year than I have this year.
Andy B (not verified)12:00pm
Apr 14
Two games to go in the season and the Wolves can end up with anywhere from 22 to 24 wins for the season. It is about where I thought they would end up at the beginning of the season and I am not touting myself as a top prognosticator. No, I think this is where most people had the Wolves finishing, if not a little (or a lot) worse. There are some obvious concerns, but also a little hope. The concerns include Jefferson at the centerspot, Foye at the point, McCants as the undersized shooting guard, Gomes at the power forward, and Brewer as the non-offensive threat small forward. Every one of the above is arguably playing out of position. But, we have a draft choice coming up and we can pick any position and reshuffle what is left, placing each player in a better role and maybe casting aside one or two others. That is, if we enter the draft with the intention of taking the best player available and not try and fill a position. But, I won’t dwell on the draft, but rather reiterate, that this team will get better just by having this year over and knowing they improved from beginning to end while still having a heart beating the last few games of the season and that is saying quite a lot given how the season started. Wittman has not proven himself to be top echelon NBA coach yet, but he has done just enough to keep himself in the job to start another season. He didn't do half bad given what he had to work with. Next year the stakes will be higher and I'll be rooting for him to bring these young Wolves to the next level and be a .500 team with an outside chance of making the playoffs come April 2009.
Andy B (not verified)11:27am
Apr 16
Was it wishful thinking or did I just get a little ahead of myself? The Wolves don't have 22 wins you dummy Andy. Perhaps after tonight.And I subscribe to the theory that winning tonight will bring good vibed into the lottery even if it puts them behind Memphis in the lottery ball count.
jesse (not verified)04:42am
Apr 15
To Aaron Couch, "Derek Rose isn't a natural point guard"? I have to strongly disagree with that statement. I saw him play more than a few games this past year. All that guy does is protect the ball, distribute the ball, call plays and score. He controlled the tempo of the game and set the tone more oft than not. He played solid defense, he has very good ball handling if not stellar skills. His decision making was as good as could be asked of a freshman. In my honest opinion, he's been NBA ready to run the point since last year when rivals was touting him and his videos of games were posted on youtube. (I admit I had to get an early look/ shaky video but you can still see his athleticism. I can understand you saying that we already have 2 guards, but first: I'd take Derek Rose over ether Foye or McCants. His upside is way way higher at this point. Note: Both McCants and Foye have been slowed by serious injuries early in their career. We don't know the long term effects yet. Second, Are you sure McCants is a starter in this league? Can he guard a premier 2 guard? Can McCants stick with Kobe? How about defend against Allen Iverson? What about Agent 0? There has to be more to McCants besides scoring, because if you put a Ron Artest, or a Kobe, or a good defender on him, what other purpose does he serve in the game if he's not scoring? Foye is a decent player. But can you honestly tell me he has "All Star" written on him? His defense is laughable. His moves are becoming predictable. And he is still coming off an injury. Don't get me wrong, I like both our guys. But I wouldn't think twice about trading 1 or the other away if we were able to draft Rose. Though... I just can't see the Wolves picking #1 or #2. Lastly, Tony Parker has 4 championship rings. Can we please, lay to rest that you need a "true point/natural point" guard to run the show in order to succeed?
Wim (Belgium) (not verified)05:54am
Apr 15
You don't see Tony Parker as a "true" point?. He is EXACTLY the player I think about when I see Rose playing. Slashing into the paint like a bat in h*ll with exceptional ability to take contact and still finish the play. Both have the ability to, despite the fact they're going so extremely fast, keep track of where everyone is and if their way to the basket is blocked they will find the open man. This skill is especially apparant in transition, I feel this way with both of them. Their defense also seems very similar to me. Ditto their shooting, tough Parker has improved his shot with working on it, I would think Rose will be able to do that too. In my eyes Tony Parker is a "true" point. He creates for others AND himself. He's fast, a very good ball handler, has very good court vision (ok, not at the same level as nash, kidd, (paul?) but hey .. still very good) especially in transition. I do agree with the backcourt assessment. I like both our guys and if I had to choose between 2 equally talented players to add to our team, one being a defensive oriented center and one being a PG, there would be no doubt in my mind, I would take the center. There's no such situation if you ask me. Can't pass on Rose in the draft. If we could get him I'd believe the championship in 3 years thing again.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <b> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
By entering in the words in the captcha image, you help us prevent automated spam submissions and keep the site tidy.

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff