Dude Weather Subscribe to Secrets Minneapolis / St. Paul

On the Ball

Draft Night Impressions that you can read this time

Drastic computer woes and a (partially related) bevy of lagging assignments sabotaged plans of duplicating last year's live blogging of the draft, and I think that's a good thing. I've got a really positive feeling about the direction of the Wolves in the past week or two, and, as with really negative feelings as well, wanted to let it linger at least overnight, parse the context and the exuberance. Some of these things are hunches, and thus a tad irrational; some are wishful thinking, no doubt, after the long, dysfunctional ride in the wilderness since the Western Conference Finals. I owe no particular allegiance to the Wolves--I love the NBA, and find my own frame of sports is more enjoyable if I let various teams and players charm and disgust me as the process unfolds. Put another way, if last year's Houston Rockets had played 41 regular season games at Target Center, I would have had a lot more fun watching and writing, but I could have said the same thing about the Hornets or even the Raptors two and three years ago, respectively, and both squads bored me to death last season.

As I've said before, however, I prefer honest optimism to scrupulous "objectivity," which is just a way to totally discount your gut feelings, something both my head and my gut think is stupid and silly.

Last night the Wolves drafted the person I considered to be the best player on the board, with a higher upside than Blake Griffin. I suspect the love/hate Rubio polarity has a lot to do with whether or not you watched the Gold Medal game of the Olympics as it unfolded last summer. When those who did discovered that the gangly kid patrolling point for Spain was 17, we knew it was the stuff of myth, such a pleasant sensation to watch that the temptation was great to overhype it and send out an endorphin alert for other hoops freaks.

Playing against the quickest, most-catlike perimeter and full-court defense that perhaps has ever been assembled, the teenaged, strength- inferior Rubio nobly compensated with enough poise, court vision, and intuitive elan to help keep his team in the game.

The Timberwolves new personnel guy put his ballclub in place to draft him by trading Mike Miller and Randy Foye. Yes, there was much luck involved--you expect Memphis and Sacramento to get it wrong, but the Thunder passing on Rubio was inexplicable. And yes, the Rubio phone call to the assembled media later that night was a public relations disaster that conjured up a dozen other star-crossed fiascos in Wolves' history. It probably had to do with him being a teenager, with English as his second language, and the ego (and financial) blow of falling to number five, coupled with the destination--none of the Olympians he performed against last summer had Timberwolves lineage, and it's hard to imagine Rubio, a student of the NBA, not sussing that the Wolves are in the low-rent district of desirability in 2009. It's very very cold, the owner can't give away tickets, and a Top 40 all-time talent advanced past the first round once in his dozen years here, then led the greatest W-L turnaround in NBA history and bagged a ring the year he left.

Whatever the reasons, Rubio was bummed--the perfect word for the juvenile ennui that poured through the phone speaker despite his half-hearted initial efforts to put on a happy face. It made you think Rubio might not ever want to come here; that this could be another way to mock the Wolves in years to come. And it might still turn out that way.

But give me that elated frisson--a precious commodity around these parts, sportswise--when the Kings went for Evans and you didn't even have to wonder if the Wolves would pounce on Rubio. For reasons of strength, comportment, an unnaturally quick scale to his ceiling, Rubio might not work out--stranger things have happened. But David Kahn and the Wolves put a loud dent in the scornful regard apportioned to the Wolves franchise by hoops fans across the country. They landed Rubio.

And give me that catastrophic frisson hanging in the air during the last few minutes of Rubio's phone call. Because speaking as a basketball fan as well as a journalist, I'd rather get jerked around by circumstance than bored by circumstance.

Worst case scenario, the Wolves have a tremendous bargaining chip to play with the Knicks or the Lakers or the Heat. Less worse case scenario, and the one that looked most likely after listening to Rubio, reading what his Dad said to a reporter, and hearing Kahn last night, is that Rubio returns to Spain to hone his game under the supervision and tutelage of the Wolves organization, begins paying more attention to what Minnesota has to offer, and arrives in a year, perhaps two--he'll turn 20 two weeks before the 2010-11 season--with a more cohesive and purposefully assembled roster to buttress his talents.

Kahn's reaction to Rubio's ambivilance was very revealing. He had extensive words of praise for Rubio's agent--a shameless and not unintelligent brown-nosing--commented on Rubio's youth, said his franchise was fully in the "youth development business" and flatly stated that if any team "could afford to be patient, it's us."

Translation: Kahn really does think this roster needs to be taken down to the studs; really does envision this taking multiple drafts and free agencies. It's an attitude that must infuriate the McHale stalwarts who heard their man quickening in his enthusiasm of the roster he had 2/3 constructed over the previous two years, backed up for a lucky but still solidly performed month of January.

I don't know if Kahn is sincere in his statements that he fully intends to play Rubio and sixth pick Jonny Flynn together in the
backcourt, but it was the one awkward stance in an otherwise commendable performance, likening the young Minnesota pair to duos like Zeke and Dumars, DJ and Ainge, and Jordan and Paxton--not because the talent gap is obviously so wide at the moment, which he freely acknowledged, but because there is a comparatively brawny defensive stud (Dumars, DJ and Jordan) in every one of the latter groups. Flynn is less than six feet in socks and Rubio will never be a lockdown defender. This is significant, because the reason you play two point guards or two off-guards who can flip roles is because one of them is so capable at handling powerhouse two-guards at the other end of the court. One of the big knocks on Randy Foye is that he's too short to handle players 6-6 and up, and there are more than a few.

Rubio and Flynn in the same backcourt left me with a familiar disconnect--my response to Kevin McHale last year, saying Jefferson and Love could be a very complementary front court. And it's true, when Al is being doubled hard and Love is thus owning the weakside glass, they are a formidable pair--except for that defensive thing. I can see Rubio and Flynn setting each other up in similar fashion, and the other three guys to boot, but out on the perimeter or getting posted up on defense, they will suffer as Jefferson/Love suffers. But to continue the kool-aid drinking tenor of this post, I don't mind the pick of Flynn at 6. In my limited knowledge of the college game, I preferred Stephon Curry, but the redundancy objections to Flynn seem way premature. The Wolves have lacked for even mediocre play at the point ever since Sam Cassell took his loud mouth and aching back out of town, and now we're supposed to think two--at one of the two marquee roles on the court--is too many?

There are a fistful of reasons Flynn at 6 makes sense. First, all the internal scuttlebutt had the Wolves braintrust utterly in love with his game--some said he was their top "realistic choice" (meaning not Griffin, Rubio or Evans) on the board. When you are just breaking camp on a long long rebuilding slog, you draft the best player available, regardless. Second, whether intended for this role or not (I suspect he wasn't), Flynn is good Rubio leverage. Rubio and his dad and his agent can't bum rush the pressure on the Wolves to utilize his value in a deal, on the pretext that they need to find a quality replacement at the point to groom--they've got Flynn to man the point, either on the guy with the head start while Rubio is in Spain or as mutual
competitors and pressure valves. Given their youth and level of physical refinement, it might do both good to share the backcourt for 15 minutes and each command the point for another 15 apiece.

Then there is the "character" aspect to Flynn--I can't remember a more favorable first impression by a Wolves' rookie since I started covering the team in 1991. He was the perfect mixture of humble and proud (saying he could learn a lot from Rubio but in a tone of voice that implied that the reverse was also true), naturally well-spoken without seeming too eager to please, and a guy without guile who assumes he can let his play do the real talkin'. I've seen him play maybe twice, along with a dozen or so highlights , so the knowledge base on him is dim for me. But I'm rooting for the guy.

"Best player available," should be the mantra of next year's draft as well. Free agency is where you can most easily mortar your foundation, and it would do the Wolves good to get a solid veteran who is talented enough to play double-digit minutes, preferably at the 2, 3 or 5. But I appreciated the way Kahn kept emphasizing that last night was just stage one in a five stage process, and that the team was going be very young and frequently exposed next season. The goal here isn't to win 40 games, or even 30 games, necessarily; it is to demonstrate a plan and a cohesive clue. In the record books, the Wolves and the Thunder had pretty much the same season last year, but whose fans have more legitimate cause for excitement. That view of a compelling horizon-- even if in the distance--has to be the main goal this year, and it absolutely can't be a mirage.

Thus far, the remolded Wolves brass is earning the trust that they know what they're doing. No question they've had enormous luck: Harden/Flynn just doesn't have the same cache. But, as Kahn promised, they already put everything on hold to sweat the little details of the draft. By most all accounts, and from what little I saw of him, Wayne Ellington is a perfect fit on the roster: A proven winner and prolific scorer out of the small forward slot. A team less confident of its draft-day scholarship might have reached a little and tabbed Ellington at 18. Instead, the Wolves leveraged the Ty Lawson pick for another first-rounder next year courtesy of the Nuggets, and Ellington was still around at 28 when it was their turn once more. That and Kahn's consistent, straightforward denial of parting with either both #5 and #6 or Kevin Love and one of those high picks in order to move up to #2 or #3 and guaranteed Rubio (clearly their top priority if available), demonstrates diligence and discipline. And it whets the appetite for the rebuilding stages to come.

Wolves-Wizards Trade Foreshadows Big Backcourt Night in Thursday's Draft

The frenzy of phone activity by new Wolves personnel guru David Kahn has been the constant buzz of the NBA gossip boards. Tonight, there is a solid report that Kahn has broken through on his desire to raze the roster and point hard toward the future, unloading Minnesota's only legitimate two-guards, Randy  Foye and Mike Miller, in exchange for a trio of Washington Wizards big men--6-9 Darius Songaila, 6-10 Etan Thomas and 7-footer Oleksiy Pecherov--plus, most importantly, the #5 overall pick in Thursday's NBA draft.

A few things stand out. First, Kahn wants to make an immediate impression and scrap the past ASAP. The keys to the deal are Miller and the #5 pick. The Wizards have got to be doing jumping jacks over their result. And the Wolves have taken the blinders off their perpetually sanguine view of two players who fans had every right to expect would perform better in Minnesota than what they actually delivered. Last but not least, there's also chatter that the Wolves could keep leveraging in their effort to move up to #2 and grab point guard Ricky Rubio.

Whether or not Rubio is part of the final equation, however, you can underline Thursday as "perimeter scoring day" at Wolves headquarters. Kahn stressed this flaw more than once during the informal breakfast I attended where he backgrounded the media on his evolving impressions and plans for the team. And he's right: Even with one of the league's top six low-post scorers drawing double-teams in the paint, the Wolves shot a league-worst 44.1% from the field last season. After scanning hours of video from last season, Kahn obviously felt the problem was the talent more than the scheme--he just dumped two of the ballclub's top three perimeter scorers in Foye and Miller (and the third, Ryan Gomes, is a 240-pound forward). How bare is the cupboard now? Well, if the Wolves had to open the 2009-10 season with the personnel currently on their roster, the starting backcourt would be Sebastian Telfair (a 38.9% shooter over his 5-year NBA career, including 31.6% from three-point range) and Corey Brewer (38% from the field, 25% from trey during his two years in the league). So we know what's on the docket for the draft and free agency: guards, guards, guards who can shoot straight.

The trade is probably good news for the chances of Rodney Carney re-upping. And, unless Rubio is the ultimate prize--and you wouldn't hear any flak from me if that's the endgame--it means Stephen Curry has a much better chance of becoming a Timberwolf in about 48 hours. Because from what I have read and youtubed (as I frequently have stated, almost all of my college smarts are received wisdom), despite a wealth of other beguiling skills, neither Tyreke Evans nor James Harden is particularly adept at perimeter shooting. Certainly we know that after the Clips take Blake Griffin first overall, three players go before the Wolves pick twice, and that two of them are likely to be Rubio and Thabeet. That means there will be  will be two "quality" backcourt players available at #5 and #6, most likely from among Harden, Evans and Curry, and the glut of point guards after Rubio, including Flynn, Jennings, Holiday and Lawson. Either Rubio or two of those other names will likely be Wolves in the very near future.

Mulling over draft picks is the most exciting activity for Wolves fans in the wake of this trade, because the trio of bigs Washington is sending our way are hardly gamechangers, and could simply become more deadwood to pile on the logjam up front. The Wolves already have three power forwards in Jefferson, Love, and Smith, plus a 6-9 center in Madsen, and a pair of smart 3/4 forward swingmen in the 6-8 Cardinal and the 6-7 Gomes. You'll notice Madsen is the only center, and he's a pipsqueak 6-9 to boot, better known for his cheerleading and his tanking clanking than his rebounding, which elevates Thomas, who goes 6-10, 260, and plays the pivot. Thomas is also a fascinating character, a staunch lefty poltiically, a poet (falling somewhere on the continuum between James Tate and Shaddy McCants) and a tough customer who has battled back from career-threatening heart problems and an assortment of other injuries. He also traded fisticuffs more than once with the Wizards' other center, Brendan Haywood--if the beat writers can't spin all this stuff into a bevy of featurettes, journalism really is comatose. Not since the Madsen trifecta--who else on earth has an advanced degree from Stanford, has been a Mormon missionary and is nicknamed Mad Dog?--has a resume been written with such neon crayons.

As a staunch lefty and published poet (waaaaay back in the day) myself, I wish I could report Thomas is a world-beater on the court. Nope. In fact the Wizards have got to be ecstatic that they beefed up their backcourt and rid themselves of an expensive draft pick they didn't want without having to dislodge the four guys in their frontcourt they most wanted to keep--Antawn Jamison, Haywood, Jarvis Mcgee and the confounding manchild Andray Blatche. That means Thomas, Songalila and the European dude dubbed "Big Oily" are 5, 6 and 7 at best, on the big man depth chart for the Wiz. That doesn't mean they are useless. In fact Songaila in particular is a grinder who knows how to rebound, foul, foster ball movement and get out of the way at the right time. Both he and Oily could also be classified as centers in McHale-speak.

But nobody is kidding anybody here. Thomas, Songaila and Pecherov are the bubble wrap around the #5 pick--Wolves fans want to move past them and see what the ballclub really got come Thursday. And, sub-mediocre bigs (literally) aside, they'll be judging if the pick is worth Mike Miller and Randy Foye.

The answer to that is tricky.  When the draft day deal with Memphis went down almost exactly a year ago, I was heartily on board for the Wolves precisely because of Miller's inclusion. He seemed like the perfect Jefferson enabler, a former ROY and 6th man of the year, a dead-eye jump-shooter who didn't mind dishing but didn't hesitate to plunge in the long-range dagger, and, as a cinching coup, a floppy-haired gym rat from the corn palace capital of Mitchell, South Dakota, which made him a flesh-and-blood answer to the much asked but rarely satisfied question: How corny can you get? But the writers of CSI should set to work on a script that explains Miller's lone season in Minnesota, which was one of the most perverse, distasteful wastes of a player's tailor-made role on a ballclub that I've ever witnessed. Instead of Mike Miller, the Wolves got a second-rate Jason Kidd, a guy who played like he wanted to patent the no-look inbounds pass; who frequently drove through three opponents in traffic so that he could leap at the hoop and then suddenly contort-spin himself for a zip-pass to an increasingly less surprised Telfair for a clanked trey; who angrily cited the fundamentals of hoops inventor James Naismith to a hapless beat writer who dared to ask why one of the game's best shooters wasn't shooting; who lay on the court in writhing agony at least 20 times during the course of the season (I don't think I'm exaggerating), then would either crawl on his belly to the bench, get helped off by teammates, or, most frequently, move as if walking on glass shards for a good two or three minutes, yet never allow himself to be taken out of the game. Miller was TOUGH and he was UNSELFISH, goddammit, and the more I watched him chew the scenery like Nicholas Cage as Macbeth while the triple-teamed Jefferson and the Wolves sank to the bottom of the league in FG%, the bigger the shingle I hung out as a Mike Miller hater.  Ahem. Regular readers are probably already aware of this.

But no matter what I think of Miller, it is sobering to consider what he might have brought if Kahn had been more patient. There are plenty of reasons why his market value is much inflated compared to what he demonstrated here in Minnesota. There are the rookie of the year and 6th man trophies, of course, and there is his reputation, just slightly tarnished, as a cold-blooded long-range shooter who cannot be left alone on the perimeter. The fact is, Miller's numbers on paper were a lot more impressive than his play on the court last year, and anyone looking at the career in toto of this historically stand-up guy and comparing it to a franchise that has long been regarded as something of a train wreck,  might plausibly conclude that the Wolves somehow screwed up Mike Miller rather than the other way around. Then there is that little matter of Miller's $10 million expiring contract. You don't think of a player of his caliber might be a nice little chip to dangle around the trading deadline next season?

But Kahn couldn't wait. Having already deep-sixed the reviled and revered McHale, he probably figured there was no sense in dilly-dallying. And if he was wrong to bum-rush Miller instead of waiting for a more propitious moment to deal him, he was absolutely right in his timing with Foye. If the kid who's heart is on the wrong side of his body can ever make another deal with the devil that is longer than the month of January--if he can display that dazzling blend of clutch shooting setting up daredevil drives setting up beautiful feeds setting up more clutch jumpers for longer than 30 days--than the Wizards have depantsed David Kahn and all the snickers about his lack of genuine front office decision-making will turn into a shaming din. But that's not the way I'd bet on it happening. Randy Foye has been in the league three years now and will be 26 when the 2009-10 season opens. He has played with Kevin Garnett and Al Jefferson and he has been given the benefit of every doubt by a braintrust desperately hoping to save a little remaining face from the disastrous Roy for Foye swap on draft night 2006. He has been force-fed point guard duties and he has then grudgingly been taken off the ball as a two-guard. Wolves fans have learned that if a player lacks a sure-fire handle and possesses non-peripheral court vision, he too frequently strives for greatness by calling his own number, and otherwise plays risk-averse, unconfidently conservative basketball, until he builds up enough success and momentum to commit foolish mistakes and re-recognize his limitations. That's the Randy Foye experiment at the point. At the two-guard, on the other hand, it became striking exactly how many off-guards in this league are 6-7 to 6-9 in height, and how difficult it is to contain them defensively if you're 6-4.

More succinctly, Foye is a classic 'tweener, which is much different than a combo. Some nights he'll flourish, as will Miller, surrounded by the superior talent and firepower of a Wizards team that has to be healthy someday. As stated, Washington didn't sacrifice anything it wanted to keep. Meanwhile, David Kahn has dropped another rock into the apathetic pond that is the Wolves' fan base. A couple more will be unloaded on Thursday, another after that with the naming of a new coach. Kahn understands that courtship is necessary, and that under these circumstances, courtship means acknowledging to the former faithful that recent history was by turns traumatic and sleep-inducing, and then not only vowing to turn the page, but walking that talk.

The other thing about courtship is the fine line between being dashing and being a dunce, between being bold and thrill-seeking and being reckless and endangering. Even those of us enjoying Kahn's nerve and understanding the logic of his response to circumstances--I completely endorse the McHale dumping and gingerly agree with this trade, pending the draft bounty--are keeping the knives sharpened. This is a courtship, not a honeymoon.

McHale Jettisoned: The Only Plausible Outcome

If new Timberwolves President of Basketball Operations David Kahn had decided to keep Kevin McHale on as coach of the ballclub, I would have thought owner Glen Taylor had made it a precondition of Kahn's hiring. In other words, no one should be surprised by today's announcement that the Wolves were terminating McHale's 16-year tenure with the franchise--a move that, depending on your logic, was either years or months overdue. 

Let's look at the lopsided balance sheet on the pros and cons of McHale continuing to coach the Wolves. The biggest plus is pretty fundamental: McHale is a very capable coach, second only to Flip Saunders in franchise history, in my estimation. He is the uber-"player's coach" in that he'll always view the game with not only a player's eyes, but a player's heart and soul. He has a profound empathy for the ecstasies and agonies pervading a player's existence, and, for better and for worse, he stubbornly refuses to downgrade that perspective as his first point of reference.  This makes him a sage teacher and a motivator of inventive durability, whose cheerleading has a greater chance of becoming self-fulfilling prophecy than most coaches under similar circumstances.  But it also makes him an equivocal taskmaster and rationalizer for his troops, as anyone who wondered why he couldn't get Al Jefferson to hustle back more often on D or Mike Miller to proactively look for his own shot discovered. McHale also has a strong, albeit under-utilized, grasp and appreciation for the big-picture ebb and flow of the game. His postgame press conferences often succinctly identify the key elements that swung the game either way. If he's less enamored with X's and O's, well, that's what assistants with chalkboards are for.

That said, McHale's first stint coaching the team was more impressive than his second, although both were sufficient to establish his ability. He took over a moribund yet bickering sub-.500 team from Flip Saunders, a squad widely expected to vie for a ring after a conference finals appearance the year before, and through a combination of steady mentorship (Michael Olowokandi probably never played better, and yes, that's faint praise) and tough love (complainer Sam Cassell came off the bench rather than start for much of McHale's stint) guided it to a 19-12 record that nearly made the playoffs. By contrast, last year's performance was easy pickin's. The ballclub has just endured Randy Wittman's too-accurate Bobby Knight imitation, and felt beat-down and ridiculed rather than spurred on by fear and/or respect, which Wittman didn't have the gravitas on his resume to provide as either a player or a coach. After his first game back on the sidelines, he fawned over the effort exhibited by his players and pledged to get better as a coach so he would be worthy of it. His over-the-top praise for both Al Jefferson and Kevin Love during their respective first years with the team was in sharp contrast to his increasingly passive-aggressive stance toward the flaws in Kevin Garnett's game during KG's final years here. No wonder Love and Jefferson would run through a wall for him. Ditto Randy Foye, who McHale freed from the constant badgering Wittman provided on his obvious, and probably unimprovable, lack of natural point guard skills. 

Yes, a more confident Wolves team won 10 of its first 12 games in January less than three weeks after McHale took over for Wittman, earning his NBA Coach of the Month honors. Many rose-colored Wolves fans would cling to that period as the potential new status quo had Al Jefferson not gotten hurt in the final minute of the game in New Orleans on Feburary 8.  But let's be realistic here, and recall some crucial facts from that stirring upward blip in January. The caliber of the opposition generally ranged from wretched to mediocre, further diluted by the Wolves' freakish run of good fortune that had five or six of their opponents losing at least one or two of their top three players going into the games. You may also recall that at the time Jefferson wrecked his knee in February, that January splurge was becoming a distant memory, and performance outlier--the team was enduring its 6th loss in 7 games that night, and the average margin of those losses was more than 9 points. Also, the largest reason for the January bounce was the best stretch of basketball in Randy Foye's career, a three-week period of excellence that he hasn't come close to duplicating before or since, Al or no Al.

The point is, a Timberwolves team at full strength--Corey Brewer as well as Jefferson ready for action all 82 games--with McHale on the sideline was still not going to play .500 basketball. That's because coach Kevin McHale still had to manage a roster assembled by GM Kevin McHale, who is an inferior talent.

Which brings us back to the no-brainer decision made by David Kahn today. If we stipulate on the "pro" side of the ledger that McHale is a good coach who enjoys the steadfast support and loyalty of his players and is a high-profile Hall of Famer on a franchise with a miniscule Q rating, consider the mountain of baggage in the "con" column. The toxic mixture of antipathy and apathy toward the Wolves organization is at an all-time high. Two or three years ago, *before* the Wolves limped through 22-60 and 24-58 seasons, the default position for the casual sports fan chatting hoops at a party was to disparage McHale with some epithet like "McFail," bemoan the team's inability to win despite the decade-long presence of Garnett, and conclude with a "who cares anyway?" shrug. Seriously, that was probably the least controversial way to parrot conventional wisdom and walk away clean.

Since that time, McHale has done enough credible scut work--stockpiling draft choices while creating cap space by dumping the bloated salaries of Davis, Blount, Jaric, Hassell and Antoine Walker--to polarize the die-hard fan base between those who think he had rebouned into competency and deserved to see part of it through as coach, and those who remembered Roy for Foye, McCants instead of Grainger, and the acquisition of Davis, Blount, Jaric, and Hassell and wanted him gone long ago. But the casual fans are even more entrenched in interrupting their overall indifference only if a gratuitous swipe can be made at the Wolves' mismanagement. It's no secret, folks, that Glen Taylor can't give away Timberwolves tickets. So, along comes David Kahn, the fresh face and new leader, knowing that a clean slate and the promise of change are the only chips he can play for awhile, and somebody actually thinks his first major decision is to going to be retaining the person who unquestionably is most responsible for the current makeup of the Wolves' sorry state of affairs? Really?

The toxic public relations is reason enough to cut McHale loose, but that aspect is actually dwarfed in significance by the philosophical, hierarchical, and temperamental train wreck in the internal affairs of the Wolves braintrust that could have easily occurred if McHale had stuck around. As I've said many times before, what daft, self-destructive gene would compel a new personnel guru like Kahn to put the person who held his job for nearly 14 years on the sidelines in charge of molding and fulfilling his fresh blueprint for restoring the team to respectability?

In case folks hadn't noticed, Kevin McHale is hardly a shrinking violet. Even after his longtime buddy and college teammate took over the coaching reins and guided the club to eight straight playoff appearances, the friction between the two men over how to manage the players both on the court and in the locker room steadily escalated, to the point where less than a year after Flip Saunders had his squad in the conference finals, McHale was bouncing him out the door and replacing him on the sidelines, resulting in bad blood and ill will that lingers to this day. Then, there was Saunders' successor, Dwane Casey. Halfway through his second year, Casey had a team almost everyone had tabbed as one of league's bottom feeders instead ensconced as the 8th seed in the rugged Western Conference, sitting pretty at 20-20. McHale fired him because he felt the ballclub "lacked consistency" under Casey, and continued to mistakenly believe that "a few tweaks" were all that was necessary to restore the club to contender status. (That was January 2007. I entitled my column on Casey's firing "McHale's Last Gasp;" this, after referring to McHale as a "lame duck" back in 2006.)

What this history demonstrates is that McHale had very strong and definite ideas about how to run the ballclub, and when those expectations weren't met, he opted for scapegoating over patience and compromise. Now, imagine what happens if McHale is back as coach. Consider that as much as "McFail" is derided and disrespected among the casual sporting public at-large, exercising command and being accorded fealty are second-nature to McHale inside the bowels of Target Center, where his tenure with the Wolves predates everyone of consequence--the entire current roster and front office, of course, and on through the departed Garnett (drafted by McHale, traded by McHale) to owner Glen Taylor himself.  McHale accepted the personnel job as a personal favor to Taylor, who needed his star power and basketball smarts, and did in fact transform a franchise that hadn't won more than 29 games in a season before he arrived into a perennial playoff team. And many believe (it certainly has been long whispered, anyway) that McHale fell on his sword over the illegal Joe Smith signing, and accepted a year's suspension without a squawk. More recently, nearly every player on the roster knows McHale actively sought their services--the best, or at least most credible, endorsement of all--and publicly defended their performance through good times and bad. They know that McHale has openly linked his fate to theirs.

Consider that the two most dominant aspects of McHale's hoops persona are a take-no-prisoners competitive fire (ask Kurt Rambis about that; or the doctor who correctly informed McHale that he might have trouble walking for the rest of his life if he continued to play in the 1987 playoffs on a broken bone and torn ligaments in his right foot) and a blatantly honest yet mischievous anti-authoritarian streak that brooks no bullshit and isn't afraid to playfully bedevil anyone, even if the perceived bullshitter was a legend like Red Auerbach or a disciplinarian like coach Bill Fitch.

Okay, take all that information and imagine what happens when Kahn and McHale start to work together. It doesn't take long to notice that Kahn is a verbally slick and Machiavellian lawyer, who can speak the language of agents and owners, and, despite never playing the game at a high level himself, has put in the long hours of study and planning and generated enough front office experience to have some very definite ideas about how to operate a franchise so that it is successful on the court and on the bottom line.  Kahn has already stated that a five-stage rebuilding of the ballclub will occur over the next 16-months, creating the expectation of dramatic change in the personnel and identity of the club over that period via the draft, free agency and trades. He has stated that, to be a championship contender, he imagines that Al Jefferson will be the team's second best player and Kevin Love may be its 4th best player. He frequently states that "everything is on the table" when considering how best to turn around the fortunes of the Wolves.

Even if McHale was genuinely willing to be the loyal lieutenant moving forward (a longshot at best, although McHale's willingness to risk the indignity of offering himself and being turned down is already a surprise), one would have to be pretty stupid to believe that synergy was a more likely outcome than dissension in the working relationship between the two men. And David Kahn is not stupid.

Indeed, Kahn shrewdly killed McHale with kindness at today's press conference. Exclaiming that it was "an especially sad day" and that his decision was "no fun," Kahn spoke of McHale as a "very special person" who is "warm" and "bright" and "has a big heart" and "cares about his players" and is "a great man" who "did some great things, some really remarkable things" for the franchise. Oh, and going in, Kahn knew of McHale's greatness, but during this process he's discovered that McHale is "a better person than I thought."

Any specifics as to why he decided not to retain McHale would be disrespectful to McHale, and he wasn't going to do that, Kahn purred, and if that bit of PR ju jitsu didn't tell you all you needed to know about why the plainspoken Iron Ranger wasn't on the premises, well, you probably overlooked the 349 good reasons that came before. Kahn did acknowledge that the more he thought about how things would unfold moving forward, "it appeared to me that there would be challenges that would difficult to surmount." Amen to that.

I've referred to Kahn as slick and Machiavellian and of the same ilk as agents and owners thus far, hardly descriptions of endearment. Stylistically, the guy is the sort of smooth operator I intuitively distrust--even his informal jibes and bon mots feel expertly calibrated. But on the nuts-and-bolts substance of his comments and strategies for the Wolves organization thus far, Kahn has been logical, insightful, well-backgrounded, and forthright. He deserves the honeymoon of an open mind from the fans, the media, and especially the players, who are likely plenty piqued at McHale's removal. I'll close with some bullet points on some of the more salient responses during today's press conference, and mention to folks reading this early enough Thursday morning that I'll be on MPR talking about McHale's removal sometime around 8 or 9 a.m.

* In response to my question about where on the continuum he would fall with respect to player disappointment over McHale's departure: Toward empathy for their feelings or in reminding them that the league is a business with consequences and neither they nor McHale should be immune, Kahn said that of course he empathized with the players and has assured them that he wants the next coach to be a positive presence who works in elevating the attitude and enthusiasm of what he anticipates will be a young team for some time to come.

*  As to who that next coach would be, Kahn said flatly, "I have no candidate--none. Nothing on the back of a napkin."

* He reminded folks that big changes are probably afoot, pointing out that "we won 24 games last year" and that while even though Jefferson was hurt, the team "has a lot of work to do." He also reminded people that "we won't do it all right away," that the changes would take time. He added that the manuvers he and the front office execute need to be thoroughly grounded in a coherent philosophy, with an eye "toward a 7 to 10 year period." Not that all the moves will be that long-term or unyielding in one direction, but that "the decisions we make need to have some lasting value."

* When a member of the media remarked that McHale had been quoted as saying that Kahn had told him last week that he was moving in a different direction and that McHale had responded that Kahn was making a mistake, Kahn replied that no such conversation took place last week. A smooth sidestep. 

* Kahn defended Kevin Love for essentially breaking the story of McHale's departure via a tweet on his Twitter account. "I don't want Kevin to feel bad about that. I don't think it is a big deal," he said. Refreshing.

* Last but not least, the most striking thing Kahn said in his sort-of background-only chat with the media over breakfast last week was that it is best when your best player generates the majority of the plays through ball possession, a la Lebron, Kobe, Wade, etc, as opposed to a Shaq or a Dwight Howard (or an Al Jefferson). He wants a dominant low post force, especially for defense, to work in tandem with Jefferson and Love, but plainly believes a larger and perhaps more realistic priority is to find good shooters and playmakers out on the perimeter and (he didn't say this, but the implication was there) hope that one evolves into a star. He acknowledged and agreed with a consensus that Blake Griffin is the best player in the draft and that Rubio and Thabeet are in the mix at 2-3, but indicated the distance between the second pick and the sixth pick, the Wolves' current slot, might not mean much is terms of the caliber of player chosen.

NBA Finals, Open Thread

I had every intential of putting up another trey after Orlando's Game Three win, but more lucrative deadlines intervened and prevailed. Hours before Game Four, let me just say that Orlando's backcourt made like Lazurus, especially Alston and Pietrus, who played incredibly well on Tuesday night. For that matter, the entire Magic squad pretty much rose to the occasion, setting a Finals record for FG accuracy at better than 62%. Throw in a blatant off game from Kobe, especially in his metier, crunch time, and it should give Magic adherents pause that the outcome was in doubt for as long as it was, in a must-win home game, no less.

Anyway, much to my chagrin, this has to be an open thread, as I just now finished a large assignment that drastically shortened my sleep window and tomorrow morning bright and early I'm among those who go down and eat breakfast with new Wolves honcho David Kahn. So, the unspooling of Game Four can take place in this playpen if you folks are so inclined. As always the quality--in depth, originality and compassion--of the comments here makes me proud to be associated with this site. Thanks for your contributions. And obviously nobody *has* to chime in here about anything, especially since I'm not going to be around to set the table in the morning.

But I will return to the Target Center and provide my feedback to whatever is going on, and maybe even embark on my long-promised posting related to the Wolves.

One more thing before I sign off until tomorrow: The commenters here, and others who have either directly or indirectly written about my I said vis a vis Gasol and Odom in my last post have convinced me that I was wrong. I remember what I saw in last year's Finals, and what I thought about it, but too many smart people have rebutted it in too many uncoordinated but highly effective ways for me to simply assume my memories and impressions trump statistics and the logic that has been presented. Maybe it's because I picked the Lakers over the Celts and needed some scapegoats that I got down on the LA forwards. No matter: Without revisiting the videotape, I'm pretty sure now I was wrong. And that's fine, not only because it's ultimately a blessing to have such smart feedback to challenge my assumptions, but also because it is at worst moot and at best reinforcing of my admiration for both Gasol and Odom in this Magic series. Gasol has been pretty solid throughout; Odom has come on mostly in the last five games. But if Kobe dishes the rock to Gasol more often on Tuesday, i'm not so sure the Magic, 62.5% FG and all, aren't playing to avoid a sweep tonight.

So, thanks for your passion and your intelliegence. I'll be watching Game Four and then hitting the sack so I can wake up sufficiently prepared to be dazzled by Mr. Kahn over scrambled eggs. And right or wrong you'll eventually get my take on Game Four and the series in general before the weekend has elapsed.

The Three-Pointer: Lakers Dodge A Bullet

Los Angeles Lakers 101, Orlando Magic 96 (OT)

Lakers lead series 2-0

1. Redemption For Gasol and Odom

When the Lakers were getting their behinds kicked by the Celtics in last year's Finals, the easy blame for the softness and passivity fell on Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom. Both lean, agile, quick and talented, both without a shred of bloodlust lingering anywhere in their DNA. One could argue that the slow dismantlement of that supposedly proud purple and gold outfit occurred as Kobe Bryant watched his team's second and third best players get bounced around without a gritty response and allowed his disgust to help disintegrate whatever chemistry existed, resulting in that embarrassing Game Six 2008 Finals blowout.

Tonight the Lakers were a last-second Courtney Lee layup from landing back in the pressure cooker, but it is fair to say that when  it came to doing all the big and little things required to snatch a ring, both Gasol and Odom more than held their own, and were genuinely as much a part of this victory, sending LA up 2-0, as was Kobe. It isn't hard to suss the Lakers' strategy: Job One is making sure that Dwight Howard doesn't get anything easy at the rim. But Howard was a much better player than the turgid giant who registered but one field goal in the series opener. From kick-outs to rebounds to transition energy to low post offense (his weakest aspect of the four just mentioned), "Superman" was more engaged. He also sank 7-9 free throws, and even the two misses were in a shooter's rhythm and not Shaq-like liners or archers off the back iron an exaggerated knee bends on the shot. Put simply, Howard came to play, much to the consternation of Andrew Bynum, who committed five fouls and had one rebound in 16:24. But with help from a rotating and trapping cast of characters, including Odom, Gasol once again did a stolid job on Howard. Put it this way, it is impossible to imagine Howard getting 40 points on a team that has Pau Gasol. Think about how silly that might have sounded last year. But, like Odom, Gasol has "toughened up" without losing his signature finesse. On defense, he's moving his feet and keeping his arms up--two crucial attributes to avoid fouls--daring Howard to have enough refined offense to score against his seven-foot length while his teammates are doubling down and rotating over. And when Gasol does look like he's about to get torched, he commits the hard, smart, sure foul. At the other end, Gasol' is a dream for interior passing, possessing both the vision to hit cutters with little shovel dishes, and the hands to receive similar passes from his teammates. If Howard strays, Gasol can make him pay. That's a big difference between the Lakers and everyone else the Magic have played in these playoffs. it was Gasol's and-one layup off a feed from Kobe that finally decided this game and it was Gasol's 7 points in overtime that led all scorers.

Odom? He canned 8 of 9 of his own shots and blocked three of Orlando's. His defense wasn't as good as Gasol's (more than once, the cameras caught him sloughing on perimeter switches, or was it just the schemes not being executed by others?), but he matched up with everyone from Marcin Gortat to Hedo Turkoglu, battled on the boards and pressured the Magic in transition. He finished with a game-best plus +10 in 45:43, which means LA was minus -4 in the 7:17 he sat. Bottom line, if Gasol and Odom don't take their Celtic beatdown as a personal challenge and vivid remembrance and fail to elevate their games the way each did tonight, the Lakers are tied at 1-1 heading to Orlando.

2. Unsolicited Advice For Stan Van Gundy

The first quarter was brutal, a 15-15 score, and more than one person was wondering if the Laker plan to deter Howard in the low block and then let their length and quickness provide enough pressure on the close-outs to sweep the Magic. Yes, many of the perimeter jumpers Orlando was clanking looked makeable, but those four or five extra inches on LA's defenders, and not nerves or the law of averages after a couple of lights-out series for dead-eye long-range shooting, might have been the difference. Then Rashard Lewis proved Orlando's inside-outside schemes were still viable. It was Lewis who figured out how to counterpunch the Lakers' hell-bent elasticity from paint to perimeter. Receiving the dish from the surrounded Howard, he'd fake the trey and penetrate a dribble-bounce or two inside the onrushing defender, then either can the jumper or dish to the wide-open teammate whose man just left to collapse on Lewis. But when his teammates couldn't hit the broad side of a barn, Lewis took matters into his own hands. In the second period, he scored 18 of his team's 20 points, shooting 7-10 while the other Magic went 1-13, with the lone non-Lewis make coming off one of his feeds. After scoring a game-high 20 points in the first half, he dished for a game-high 5 assists in the second half and overtime, finishing with 34 points, 11 rebounds, and 7 assists. Those are Kobe-like numbers to go with his Kobe-like shots to finish off the Celtics and Cavs in crunchtime. The point is not that  Rashard Lewis is the second coming of Kobe--he's far from it--but that he's not the guy who deserves grief for signing a ridiculously expensive contract while being the third-best player on his team. Right now it doesn't look like such a foolish investment.

Just as Lakers want to do everything possible to take away Howard from Orlando's offense, the Magic are trying to minimize the damage Kobe wreaks when the Lakers have the ball. Both stars face a myriad assortment of traps and rotations, which is why despite playing relatively savvy, gritty games tonight, both committed 7 turnvoers. To continue the comparison, just as the Lakers' default defense on Howard--Gasol instead of Bynum as the primary backstop--worked better than the original concept, the Magic should be discovering that starter and initially-designated Kobe-stopper Courtney Lee is simply overmatched here. You can see Kobe coast when Lee is on him. He knows he can get off his shot whenever he wants, so he spends more time surveying the floor, looking to involve his teammates. In Game Two, you could see that Lee took to heart suggestions that he wasn't sufficiently aggressive, but all his newfound industry got him was a pair of quick whistles and a seat on the bench. Bottom line, it is time to take Courtney Lee off Kobe Bryant.

This quasi-demotion would be much easier to execute if Lee wasn't the one who went up a tad too strong on the last second layup in regulation and essentially blew an Orlando win as a result. All season long, Lee has demonstrated remarkable poise and self-regard for a rookie, but it is difficult to imagine his disposition not taking a significant hit if he loses his starting assignment right after the layup muff. But no matter. Mickael Pietrus needs to begin the game on Kobe and the next option should be Hedo Turkoglu, who defended the "Black Mamba" better than any other Magic player during the fourth quarter and overtime of tonight's contest. If Turkoglu wasn't so important to the facilitation of the offense, I'd gamble sapping much of his energy deterring Kobe.

However you want to parse it, Orlando's backcourt is killing their chances of beating LA as the substitution rotations are now constituted. Tonight, Alston, Lee, Pietrus, Reddick and Nelson shot a combined 7-30 FG, including 1-13 from three-point range. In Game One, the same quintet were 14-43 FG and 5-16 from beyond the arc. As if that weren't bad enough, four of the five can't guard Kobe and have allowed Derek Fisher sufficient space for his jumper and a paucity of resistance for his dribble drives to boost his confidence. Normally I agree with most everything Jeff Van Gundy says, but the staunch advocacy he and his broadcast partner Mark Jackson make for Jameer Nelson is nuts. Yes, Nelson is the most talented point guard on the team, and no, he is not the guy to play his way back into rhythm and team chemistry after many months of successful high-pressure games in his absence. In fact, along with starting Pietrus, I'd give forgotten point guard Anthony Johnson back his minutes, because Johnson, like Turkoglu, generally makes the smart, unflashy play, and smart and unflashy are the best weapons against the Lakers' length and quickness. In my humble opinion, Johnson is also the best defensive matchup for Fisher. Does that mean you don't play Nelson at all? Maybe. It depends on the foul situation and the matchups. The more time you put Turkoglu on Kobe, the more you ride Johnson or Nelson at the expense of Rafer Alston, because you need to compensate for lesser facilitation of the offense while he concentrates on D.

This much we do know: Courtney Lee can't guard Kobe Bryant. Hedo Turkoglu looks like he can do it for some stretches. Rafer Alston likewise looks like a bad matchup in this series unless he can figure out how to beat the Lakers' bigs back in transition--or determines he's tough enough to stop Fisher off the dribble. Sticking with Lee and Alston as your starting backcourt is not a recipe for surmounting a 2-0 deficit against the Lakers. Nor is riding Jameer Nelson at the expense of Anthony Johnson.

3. Quick Hits

Jeff Van Gundy is bending over backwards not to show favoritism towards his brother's team, but even he couldn't help but point out that the 6th foul on Pietrus should have been a no-call, and ditto the whistle on Turkoglu when Kobe inexplicably fell down and grabbed his left hammy and buttocks. Meanwhile, Trevor Ariza collided hard with Lewis out on the perimeter and because no shot or pass was being attempted and Lewis maintained his dribble, no call was made. I have no problem with that--provided Pietrus and Turkoglu are afforded the same respect at the other end fo the court.,

The out of bounds play devised by Stan Van Gundy at the buzzer in regulation was brilliant--at least in concept. Coming out of the timeout, everyone was wondering whether they'd alley oop to Howard or try to free up their large outside gunners, Lewis and/or Turkoglu. Instead, it was a multiple pick situation that allowed Lee to sneak free and receive a lob and an open lane to the hoop. The great defender Kobe Bryant was caught with his shorts down. Much as I'd love to unconditionally laud SVG, however, one reason you go to the expected crunchtime guys at crunchtime is because they are less likely to muff their window of opportunity. SVG opted to live and die diagramming a scheme to free up a rookie on the franchise's most important play in 15 years--and died with it.

As the NBA opened their training camps in October and people imagined the Lakers' quest in returning to the Finals, how many envisioned such a large role for defensive stopper Trevor Ariza? It is the key role players that elicit the intimacy of shared trivia when recalled decades later. Ariza will do that for 40-something hoops junkies in LA round about 2035.

 

Blogs

Sports

Baseball:
Warning Track Power by Alex Halsted
Sports:
On the Ball by Britt Robson

Society

Weather:
Dude Weather by Jimmy Gaines

A&E

Fiction:
Write Now! by Terry Faust

Retired

Hockey:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Style:
Hook & Eye
Misc:
Is This News?
Fiction:
Yo, Ivanhoe by Brad Zellar
Food:
Consider the Egg by Stephanie March
Wine:
Beyond the Cask
Food:
Food Fight!
Media:
To the Slaughter
Misc:
Outrage by Staff
Food:
Chef's Table
Guest Commentary:
Just Passing Through
Humor:
Spazz Dad by Todd Smith
Cars:
Road Rake by Chris Birt
Commentary:
Read Menace by Tom Bartel
Society:
The Adventures of Melinda by Melinda Jacobs
Politics:
Defenestrator by Rich Goldsmith
Food:
Breaking Bread by Jeremy Iggers & Ann Bauer
Books:
Cracking Spines by Max Ross
Music:
Hear, Hear by Staff
Art:
The Vicious Circle by 6 Critics
Secrets:
Secrets of the Day by Kate Iverson
Theater:
Seen in the City by Staff
Film:
Talk About Talkies by Staff